2008
DOI: 10.1109/icassp.2008.4518551
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Combination of strongly and weakly constrained recognizers for reliable detection of OOVS

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
34
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In our proposed selection technique we use a word confidence measure Cmax based on these frame level word posteriors [38], given as the maximum word confidence of the word in its hypothesized time interval (ts, t f )…”
Section: Asr-based Word Confidence Scoresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our proposed selection technique we use a word confidence measure Cmax based on these frame level word posteriors [38], given as the maximum word confidence of the word in its hypothesized time interval (ts, t f )…”
Section: Asr-based Word Confidence Scoresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is clear from Fig. 1 that the condence measurement based on fragment posterior probability (dotdashed line tagged as P f rag ) in hybrid confusion networks outperforms existing methods based on condence measures from LVCSR systems and word entropy (solid line further from the origin) of the word based system [4]. As shown by the closest solid line to origin in Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…Although sub word posteriors are very good for detecting OOV regions, we also explored the use of additional features in Eqn. 2 that contain complimentary information such as those used in the JHU workshop [4]. They include:…”
Section: Fragment Posteriors Using Consensusmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations