2014
DOI: 10.1088/1755-1315/18/1/012016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Combination of SPOT-5 and ALOS PALSAR images in estimating aboveground biomass of lowland Dipterocarp forest

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
8
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This result showed a slightly better performance than that reported by Hamdan et al [70] who estimated AGB by fitting regression models to reflectance data (corrected by ToA) from the SPOT-5 and ALOS PALSAR (R 2 = 0.803; RMSE = 32.6 Mg¨ha´1). Furthermore, in a study in southwest Colorado (USA), a lower correlation for biomass prediction (r = 0.86, RMSE = 45.6 Mg¨ha´1) with data corresponding to vegetation indices and texture analysis in Landsat TM images corrected by ToA radiometric correction was obtained [18].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 56%
“…This result showed a slightly better performance than that reported by Hamdan et al [70] who estimated AGB by fitting regression models to reflectance data (corrected by ToA) from the SPOT-5 and ALOS PALSAR (R 2 = 0.803; RMSE = 32.6 Mg¨ha´1). Furthermore, in a study in southwest Colorado (USA), a lower correlation for biomass prediction (r = 0.86, RMSE = 45.6 Mg¨ha´1) with data corresponding to vegetation indices and texture analysis in Landsat TM images corrected by ToA radiometric correction was obtained [18].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 56%
“…This result is echoed by Hamdan et al. () and Attarchi and Gloaguen (), who both used spaceborne L‐band radar to estimate biomass in tropical and temperate forests respectively. This suggests that integrating or fusing multispectral and radar imagery could provide an important opportunity to improve biomass monitoring in the absence of a spaceborne LiDAR sensor.…”
Section: Benefits For Ecology Biodiversity Research and Conservationmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…First, imagery from different sensors can be used as separate predictors to estimate a parameter of interest. This includes using multispectral and radar imagery jointly in a classification algorithm (Haack, Solomon, Bechdol, & Herold, 2002;Naidoo, Mathieu, Main, Wessels, & Asner, 2016) or a statistical model (Hamdan, Hasmadi, & Aziz, 2014;Poggio & Gimona, 2017;van der Wal & Herman, 2007). This is commonly referred to as decision-level fusion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An experiment has found that the backscattering intensity interacted only with trees of dbh larger than 15 cm. These stands are actually dominating the higher canopies, which gave the best response to backscatter in HV polarization of L-band [13]. Other factors-such as orientation of the forest, polarimetry, incidence angle, and crown structure-also play important role in the estimated biomass [36,37].…”
Section: Non-linear Regressionmentioning
confidence: 99%