2006
DOI: 10.1007/s00024-005-0005-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Combination of Precise Leveling and InSAR Data to Constrain Source Parameters of the Mw = 6.5, 26 December 2003 Bam Earthquake

Abstract: Abstract-We used new precise leveling data acquired 40 days after the Bam earthquake in combination with radar interferometry observations from both ascending and descending orbits to investigate static deformation associated with the 2003 Bam earthquake. We invert this geodetic data set to gain insight into the fault geometry and slip distribution of the rupture. The best-fitting dislocation model is a steeply east-dipping right-lateral strike-slip fault that has a size of 11 by 8 km and strikes N2°W. We find… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
28
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
2
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Seismological and geodetic source models proposed that slip in the earthquake was concentrated between 2-8 km depth, with a maximum fault slip of 2.7 m (Fialko et al 2005;Funning et al 2005;Stramondo et al 2005;Motagh et al 2006;Peyret et al 2007). However, the pattern of aftershocks extended well beneath the co-seismic slip patch, to nearly 20 km depth (Nakamura et al 2005;Tatar et al 2005), suggesting the bottom ∼10 km of the fault zone remained unruptured, yet is able to generate earthquakes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Seismological and geodetic source models proposed that slip in the earthquake was concentrated between 2-8 km depth, with a maximum fault slip of 2.7 m (Fialko et al 2005;Funning et al 2005;Stramondo et al 2005;Motagh et al 2006;Peyret et al 2007). However, the pattern of aftershocks extended well beneath the co-seismic slip patch, to nearly 20 km depth (Nakamura et al 2005;Tatar et al 2005), suggesting the bottom ∼10 km of the fault zone remained unruptured, yet is able to generate earthquakes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Remote sensing measurements using techniques such as Interferometric Synthetic Aperture Radar (InSAR) are becoming increasingly important in such studies as they provide regional and spatially-continuous maps of deformation with great accuracy (< cm), without the need of performing much field work or expensive ground surveys [1][2][3][4][5][6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The earthquake signal south of the Bam city can clearly be seen. Figure 4A.1 shows displacements along the north-south oriented (Fialko et al, 2005;Motagh et al, 2006) earthquake causative fault that were previously unknown (Jonsson et al, 2004). Higher values in the urban, mountainous and vegetated areas are due mainly to temporal decorrelation and earthquake induced damages.…”
Section: A4 Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The post-earthquake ASAR image was recorded 47 days after the earthquake. There was no evidence of any post-seismic displacement within that period (Fialko et al, 2005;Motagh et al, 2006;Peyret et al, 2007). It has been postulated that the earthquake causative fault had an extension towards the north, passing below the city Peyret et al, 2006).…”
Section: A2 Datasetmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation