2019
DOI: 10.1007/s11274-019-2734-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Combination of natural antimicrobials for contamination control in ethanol production

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 7 shows that there was no obvious change in the morphology of the S. cerevisiae in the buffer solution, the lysozyme solution or the crystallisation solution (lysozyme solution mixed with sodium chloride solution). Under the fluorescence microscope, there was no obvious fragmentation of the S. cerevisiae observed during 96 h in two kinds of solutions with the lysozyme, indicating that lysozyme did not lead to the lysis of the S. cerevisiae, which was in agreement with the literatures 35 , 36 . Most S. cerevisiae survived with lysozyme in the solution, and maintained its morphology during the crystallisation, shown in SEM images of Fig.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Figure 7 shows that there was no obvious change in the morphology of the S. cerevisiae in the buffer solution, the lysozyme solution or the crystallisation solution (lysozyme solution mixed with sodium chloride solution). Under the fluorescence microscope, there was no obvious fragmentation of the S. cerevisiae observed during 96 h in two kinds of solutions with the lysozyme, indicating that lysozyme did not lead to the lysis of the S. cerevisiae, which was in agreement with the literatures 35 , 36 . Most S. cerevisiae survived with lysozyme in the solution, and maintained its morphology during the crystallisation, shown in SEM images of Fig.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Lysozyme can act on the β-1,4 bond between N-acetylmuramic acid and N-acetylglucosamine in the peptide polysaccharide molecule, which destroys the cell wall of bacteria, losing its protective effect on cells, and finally makes bacteria dissolve and die 34 . However, lysozyme has limited impact on the cell wall lysis of the S. cerevisiae, due to the lack of lysozyme sites in its cell wall 35 , 36 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Maia et al . (2019) reported bacterial decreases of 1·58 and 5 log cycles when applying hop extract (5 mg l –1 ) and nisin (30 mg l –1 ), respectively, in fermentation tests with co‐culture of S. cerevisiae and L. fermentum , with no negative effects on S. cerevisiae . Previous studies have demonstrated that co‐cultures of S. cerevisiae and L. fermentum submitted to the acid treatment (sulfuric acid, pH 2·0) in fermentation cycles utilizing sugarcane juice (sterilized or not) showed no effect of the acid treatment on the yeast count but a significant decrease in the L. fermentum count (3–5 log CFU ml –1 cycles).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bioethanol fermentation facilities are inherently prone to bacterial contamination found in raw materials such as corn mash and process water [ 4 , 6 , 28 , 29 ] which is difficult to eradicate from facilities [ 30 , 31 ] even with chemical treatments such as hop acids and chlorine-based oxides [ 9 , 10 ]. LAB species, in particular, L. fermentum , have been found to be one of the primary contaminants that thrive under the conditions typically found in bioethanol fermentation, such as low pH, high glucose concentration, and anaerobic conditions, and can have a negative impact on ethanol-producing yeast, leading to unpredictable acute stuck fermentation [ 32 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%