2010
DOI: 10.1002/dc.21202
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Combination of MUC5ac and WT‐1 immunohistochemistry is useful in distinguishing pancreatic ductal carcinoma from ovarian serous carcinoma in effusion cytology

Abstract: Malignant ascites may be the first presentation of an unsuspected cancer. Pancreas and ovary are among the organs that are usually evaluated as a source of primary. The purpose of this study is to investigate a panel of immunohistochemical stains to help differentiate pancreatic from ovarian carcinoma. We evaluated the immunohistochemical staining of eight commercially available antibodies MUC1, MUC2, MUC5ac, Wilm's tumor susceptibility gene 1 (WT1), cytokeratin 7 (CK7), CK20, CA125, and CA19.9 in 25 effusion … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
18
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
(22 reference statements)
2
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There is little controversy regarding the observation that solid cancers of non-mesodermal origin rarely show nuclear immunostaining but frequently exhibit cytoplasmic immunostaining, while mesodermal tissues provide the nuclear immunostaining (8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24)28). Differences of the conclusions about WT1 expression in non-mesodermal solid cancers stem largely from a discrepancy in interpretations of the cytoplasmic immunostaining.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…There is little controversy regarding the observation that solid cancers of non-mesodermal origin rarely show nuclear immunostaining but frequently exhibit cytoplasmic immunostaining, while mesodermal tissues provide the nuclear immunostaining (8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24)28). Differences of the conclusions about WT1 expression in non-mesodermal solid cancers stem largely from a discrepancy in interpretations of the cytoplasmic immunostaining.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pathologists generally consider the cytoplasmic immunostaining for WT1 as non-specific reaction; they have described that WT1 is hardly expressed in nonmesodermal solid cancers such as colon cancer (0%) (11,15), pancreatic cancer (0%) (16), thyroid cancer (0%) (11), prostate cancer (0%) (11), lung cancer (0-20%) (8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15) and breast cancer (0-7%) (11,13,15). The pathologists thus use WT1 to distinguish mesothelioma from lung cancers (8,(10)(11)(12)(13), or ovarian cancer cells from pancreatic cancer cells in malignant ascites (16). The present study scientifically supports the pathologists to judge the cytoplasmic immunostaining for WT1 as non-specific.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Because MUC1 and MUC4 are expressed mainly by the epithelial cells and are frequently overexpressed in carcinoma cells, it would be reasonable to anticipate its applicability in discriminating MAC from both benign and malignant mesothelial cells. However, studies on the expression of these mucins in body cavity fluids are limited [13,14,15,16,17,18]. Using immunocytochemistry, Han et al [18] analyzed expression of MUC1 in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded cell blocks prepared from effusion specimens with evidence of metastatic carcinoma.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, studies on the expression of these mucins in body cavity fluids are limited [13,14,15,16,17,18]. Using immunocytochemistry, Han et al [18] analyzed expression of MUC1 in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded cell blocks prepared from effusion specimens with evidence of metastatic carcinoma. MUC1 immunoreactivity was detected in all cases of pancreatic (9 of 9; 100%) and ovarian carcinomas (14 of 14; 100%).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%