2014
DOI: 10.3413/nukmed-0650-14-03
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Combination of MRI and dynamic FET PET for initial glioma grading

Abstract: SummaryAim: MRI and PET with 18 F-fluoro-ethyl-tyrosine (FET) have been increasingly used to evaluate patients with gliomas. Our purpose was to assess the additive value of MR spectroscopy (MRS), diffusion imaging and dynamic FET-PET for glioma grading. Patients, methods: 38 patients (42 ± 15 aged, F/M: 0.46) with untreated histologically proven brain gliomas were included. All underwent conventional MRI, MRS, diffusion sequences, and FET-PET within 3±4 weeks. Performances of tumour FET time-activity-curve, ea… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Using this approach, there was only one false negative case out of the 46 examined, equating to 97% PET sensitivity. These results are consistent with the 92% PET sensitivity observed by Pauleit et al, and are slightly better than those presented in a meta-analysis (82%) examining the use of FET PET to distinguish brain tumours from non-malignant lesions [ 9 ]. It should be emphasised that our study included only patients with a strong suspicion of gliomas on MRI, while studies included in the meta-analysis used various criteria for defining FET PET positivity.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Using this approach, there was only one false negative case out of the 46 examined, equating to 97% PET sensitivity. These results are consistent with the 92% PET sensitivity observed by Pauleit et al, and are slightly better than those presented in a meta-analysis (82%) examining the use of FET PET to distinguish brain tumours from non-malignant lesions [ 9 ]. It should be emphasised that our study included only patients with a strong suspicion of gliomas on MRI, while studies included in the meta-analysis used various criteria for defining FET PET positivity.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The threshold value of 1.75 for rCBV provides a sensitivity and specificity of 95.0% and 57.5%, respectively. The combination of rCBV and MRS resulted in a sensitivity and specificity of 93.3% and 60.0%, respectively [ 25 ], while the combination of diffusion MRI and dynamic PET revealed improved sensitivity (67–86%) and specificity (63–67% to 100%) [ 9 ]. However, even the combined MRI and PET modalities assessed in the latter study were of lower accuracy than TBR sum defined using dynamic PET alone, as reported here.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In Dunvet's study, 38 glioma patients underwent conventional MRI, MRS, diffusion sequences, and fluoroethyltyrosine PET (FET-PET). 76 The tumor time− activity curve reached the best accuracy by distinguishing between low-and high-grade gliomas followed by ADC histogram analysis. Combining the time−activity curve and ADC histogram analyses improved the sensitivity from 67% to 86% and the specificity from 63−67% to 100%.…”
Section: Molecular Pharmaceuticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, metastasectomy, whole brain radiation, or gamma-knife surgery). Studies have shown that PET/MRI with brain tumor-targeted tracers such as [ 11 C]methionine and 18 F-fluoro-ethyl-tyrosine ( 18 F-FET) is feasible, and is as accurate as PET/CT [ 26 , 27 ]. However, most studies describe imaging of primary brain tumors, and there is a paucity of data on brain metastases.…”
Section: Assessment Of Local Tumormentioning
confidence: 99%