Combination of Drilling with Casing and Stage Tool Cementing: A Unique
Approach to Mitigating Downhole Conditions

Robinson, Ryan; Rosenberg, Steven Michael; Lirette, Brent; Odell, Albert Charles; Montgomery, Monty

doi:10.2523/105457-ms

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…• Minimal or no hole preparation is required as in regular drilling practices because the liner can be landed and cemented almost immediately on reaching target depth with minimal delay for circulation. A special bit or mill run is not required, thus eliminating a costly milling trip (Robinson et al 2007). hole.…”

Section: Addressing Wellbore Instability and Lost Circulation In Framentioning

confidence: 99%

Eliminating Non-Productive Time Associated with Drilling through Trouble Zones

York¹,

Prichard

Dodson³

et al. 2009

All Days

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Cost overruns can easily manifest during well construction due to unexpected issues including lost returns, differential sticking, and narrow pore pressure/fracture gradients. To better plan for potential overruns, operators sometimes earmark 10 to 25% of the Authorization for Expenditures (AFE) to cover the unexpected, which can significantly impact drilling budgets. Technical and operational risks versus the potential return on investment (ROI) are critical factors in determining whether a project proceeds.Too often the best drilling practices used to address trouble zones are limited to a few conventional methods with a narrow range of effectiveness. Also, a lack of rock mechanics knowledge can prevent the most efficient solution being applied.Some operators are implementing planning programs that assess and integrate the latest processes and technologies to address drilling risks up-front. Cutting-edge technologies such as managed pressure drilling methods, drilling with casing / drilling with liners, and solid expandable casing have been highly effective. Implementing proactive evaluation processes and applying the latest tools and techniques can efficiently address operational risks and trouble zones to ultimately reduce NPT and associated costs.Employing common practices and technologies that are typically ineffective and that drive up NPT cost should be considered unacceptable. Common sense well construction evaluation processes used in conjunction with validated conventional and new technologies have proven their worth by reducing expenditures and risks, preventing the loss of wells, and increasing the operator's ROI. This paper will review real drilling challenges that have been encountered and the common practices that were employed to address these drilling hazards. This paper will compare and contrast how these same circumstances have and can be addressed much more efficiently with engineering evaluation processes that help determine the best drilling tool and/or technique to mitigate risks and reduce NPT.

show abstract

Section: Addressing Wellbore Instability and Lost Circulation In Framentioning

confidence: 99%