2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.microc.2020.104852
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Combination of analyte protectants and sandwich injection to compensate for matrix effect of pesticides residue in GC–MS/MS

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This relative signal suppression may be due to analytes' behavior in the GC inlet (liner and start of the column) that could be affected by the presence of other compounds from the matrix. 24 Matrix components may co-elute with the target analytes, causing ionization suppression in the mass spectrometer. On the other hand, 4 analytes presented positive matrix effects, namely: dicofol, cyfluthrin, p , p ′-DDT and chlorantraniliprole.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This relative signal suppression may be due to analytes' behavior in the GC inlet (liner and start of the column) that could be affected by the presence of other compounds from the matrix. 24 Matrix components may co-elute with the target analytes, causing ionization suppression in the mass spectrometer. On the other hand, 4 analytes presented positive matrix effects, namely: dicofol, cyfluthrin, p , p ′-DDT and chlorantraniliprole.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A reduction of more than three times was observed in the case of the compounds that showed a more significant matrix effect. Nevertheless, although the use of analyte protectants reduces the matrix effect and improves peak shape [135,136], these compounds must be dissolved in polar solvents such as water and MeCN. The injection of these solvents in GC systems has several drawbacks (i.e., limitations on injection volumes due to their high expansion coefficient, and poor focusing of chromatographic peaks due to their high polarity), which represents the main disadvantage of this strategy for reducing the matrix effect [69,126].…”
Section: Matrix Effectmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Matrix effect must be considered in mass spectrometry, which means the change in the analytical signal is caused by anything in the sample matrix (33). Signal suppression or enhancement of the analyte due to the coelution of matrix components could influence the accuracy of the method (34)(35)(36). Matrix effect could be caused by compounds brought from complex matrices of analytical samples, solvents, reagents, and materials used in sample preparation or solvents, buffers, and additives contained in the mobile phase.…”
Section: Matrix Effectmentioning
confidence: 99%