2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.procs.2010.04.159
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Combination of an adaptive multilevel SQP method and a space-time adaptive PDAE solver for optimal control problems

Abstract: We present an adaptive multilevel generalized SQP method to solve PDAE-constrained optimization problems. It explicitly allows the use of independent integration schemes such that all involved systems can be solved highly efficient and as accurate as desired. We will couple the optimization with the state-of-the-art PDAE solver KARDOS and apply the new tool to a radiative heat transfer problem described by space-time dependent non-linear partial differential algebraic equations. Results are presented, compared… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
(13 reference statements)
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…57,65 This leads to a large, nonlinear system that couples all spatial and temporal DOFs of the discretised Navier-Stokes and adjoint Navier-Stokes equations. Solving this system requires the development of specialised solvers but can in some cases lead to superior performance compared with reduced approach (see, for example, Clever et al 66 ) and is therefore an interesting avenue for future improvements. NN9279K and NN9316K.…”
Section: Conclusion Discussion and Future Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…57,65 This leads to a large, nonlinear system that couples all spatial and temporal DOFs of the discretised Navier-Stokes and adjoint Navier-Stokes equations. Solving this system requires the development of specialised solvers but can in some cases lead to superior performance compared with reduced approach (see, for example, Clever et al 66 ) and is therefore an interesting avenue for future improvements. NN9279K and NN9316K.…”
Section: Conclusion Discussion and Future Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…M) can be different for each fuzzy approximator. Also in (11) we considered the initial condition x(t 0 ) = x 0 . If we have other initial conditions, for example if x(t 0 ) is free, then we must have p(t 0 ) = 0 and thus we can define p F in (11) as:…”
Section: Definition 1 ([26])mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus conditions (3) can be stated in the following form: with the initial and final conditions x(0) = 0 and x(1) = 0.5. Thus the corresponding fuzzy system (see (11)) solutions can be constructed as follows:…”
Section: Numerical Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The function u d , called desired control, is a guideline for the control; see, e.g., [14,26]. Note that this formulation also allows for the special and most common case, u d = 0, i.e., there is no a priori information on the optimal control.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%