2008
DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(08)61752-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Combination HIV prevention

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
38
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
1
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The diminishing hope that a single behavioral or biomedical prevention intervention will be sufficient to address the growing HIV pandemic has heralded a programmatic shift towards combination HIV prevention programming [56][57][58][59]. By combining interventions with partial effectiveness targeted to populations most at risk, combination intervention packages should address both the biological and behavioral factors associated with transmission as well as the social and structural determinants that can aid or impede the success of HIV prevention programming [56][57][58][59]. Under this new paradigm, behavioral approaches to HIV prevention are critical components of prevention packages for both women and men, as a strategy to reduce high-risk sexual behavior and inform and educate the community, but also as a mechanism to improve the uptake, adherence, and proper use of biomedical intervention methods.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The diminishing hope that a single behavioral or biomedical prevention intervention will be sufficient to address the growing HIV pandemic has heralded a programmatic shift towards combination HIV prevention programming [56][57][58][59]. By combining interventions with partial effectiveness targeted to populations most at risk, combination intervention packages should address both the biological and behavioral factors associated with transmission as well as the social and structural determinants that can aid or impede the success of HIV prevention programming [56][57][58][59]. Under this new paradigm, behavioral approaches to HIV prevention are critical components of prevention packages for both women and men, as a strategy to reduce high-risk sexual behavior and inform and educate the community, but also as a mechanism to improve the uptake, adherence, and proper use of biomedical intervention methods.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent calls for "combination HIV prevention" and "back to basics" approaches to HIV emphasize the use of combinations of feasible and proven interventions. 10,11 A recent review listed priority STI control interventions to include "STI treatment of high-risk sub-populations, comprehensive case management of symptomatic STIs, antenatal syphilis screening and treatment and ophthalmia neonatorum prophylaxis, condom promotion and risk reduction counselling" with increased emphasis on the role of STI clinics in identifying and counselling HIV-infected persons and in diagnosing and managing their STIs. 12 The review pragmatically provides evidence for the effectiveness of individual intervention components within the fragmented domains of STI control and HIV prevention, while making a case for better alignment of efforts.…”
Section: Back To Basicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only five of these trials demonstrated a protective benefit, three focused on the same intervention (male circumcision), and four of them assessed prevention at the individual level and not the population level. As Padian and colleagues5 point out, part of the problem has been the focus on the discovery of a ‘magic bullet’ solution for HIV prevention, whereas there is increasing interest in shifting to combination prevention packages that could capitalise on synergies among interventions 6 7. This more comprehensive approach presumes that the causes of epidemics within specific contexts are known and that the correct intervention mix can therefore be selected.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%