2019
DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.2018-0856
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Combination Cisplatin-Epirubicin-Paclitaxel Therapy for Metastatic Extramammary Paget's Disease

Abstract: Extramammary Paget's disease (EMPD) is a rare cutaneous adenocarcinoma that clinicopathologically resembles breast cancer. The prognosis of metastatic EMPD is poor. Although several chemotherapies have been tried, the effects are temporary; better drugs and combinations are required. In the present study, we retrospectively analyze the efficacy and safety of combination of cisplatin, epirubicin, and paclitaxel in five metastatic EMPD cases. The efficacy was better than that for previously reported regimens: 80… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
25
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
2
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Currently, there is no consensus regarding the optimal chemotherapeutic regimen for treatment of metastatic EMPD. Numerous case reports and small retrospective studies have documented the efficacies of several regimens, including low‐dose 5‐fluorouracil + cisplatin (FP), 5‐fluorouracil, epirubicin, carboplatin, vincristine and mitomycin (FECOM) combination, the docetaxel (DTX) + S‐1 regimen and the cisplatin, epirubicin and paclitaxel combination regimen . However, treatment outcomes of these are not necessarily satisfactory.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Currently, there is no consensus regarding the optimal chemotherapeutic regimen for treatment of metastatic EMPD. Numerous case reports and small retrospective studies have documented the efficacies of several regimens, including low‐dose 5‐fluorouracil + cisplatin (FP), 5‐fluorouracil, epirubicin, carboplatin, vincristine and mitomycin (FECOM) combination, the docetaxel (DTX) + S‐1 regimen and the cisplatin, epirubicin and paclitaxel combination regimen . However, treatment outcomes of these are not necessarily satisfactory.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous case reports and small retrospective studies have documented the efficacies of several regimens, including lowdose 5-fluorouracil + cisplatin (FP), 5-fluorouracil, epirubicin, carboplatin, vincristine and mitomycin (FECOM) combination, the docetaxel (DTX) + S-1 regimen and the cisplatin, epirubicin and paclitaxel combination regimen. [4][5][6][7] However, treatment outcomes of these are not necessarily satisfactory. While low-dose FP and FECOM regimens show median progression-free survival (PFS) of 5.2 and 6.5 months, respectively, both showed median overall survival (OS) of less than 1 year.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At present, no chemotherapeutic agents have yet been approved for the treatment of metastatic EMPD. Several cytotoxic chemotherapeutic regimens have been used to treat metastatic EMPD, such as combination of low-dose 5-fluorouracil and cisplatin (FP therapy), combination of 5-fluorouracil, epirubicin, carboplatin, vincristine, and mitomycin C (FECOM therapy), combination of cisplatin, epirubicin and paclitaxel (PET therapy), combination of docetaxel and S-1, docetaxel monotherapy, and S-1 monotherapy (6876). In general, certain patient populations initially respond well to these therapies.…”
Section: Treatment Of Metastatic Empdmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, modification of the treatment schedule or improvement of the chemotherapeutic regimen may enhance the efficacy. In PET therapy, adjustment of the dosing interval enabled Japanese metastatic EMPD patients to continue treatment by reducing its severe toxicity, while maintaining its high efficacy (76).…”
Section: Treatment Of Metastatic Empdmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 9 – 16 ] For EMPDs, single-agent taxane, cisplatin, or fluoropyrimidine-based regimens are used. [ 17 25 ] Nevertheless, evidence regarding the clinical benefit of these therapies is limited, mainly due to the rarity of these cancers and the challenges involved in the design of well-controlled clinical trials. Conducting clinical studies in patients with adnexal carcinomas is even more challenging, as the incidence of adnexal carcinoma is extremely low.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%