2022
DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac63c9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

COMAP Early Science. VII. Prospects for CO Intensity Mapping at Reionization

Abstract: We introduce COMAP-EoR, the next generation of the Carbon Monoxide Mapping Array Project aimed at extending CO intensity mapping to the Epoch of Reionization. COMAP-EoR supplements the existing 30 GHz COMAP Pathfinder with two additional 30 GHz instruments and a new 16 GHz receiver. This combination of frequencies will be able to simultaneously map CO(1–0) and CO(2–1) at reionization redshifts (z ∼ 5–8) in addition to providing a significant boost to the z ∼ 3 sensitivity of the Pathfinder. We examine a set of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
35
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 83 publications
2
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the first-season COMAP instrument observes at frequencies between 26 and 34 GHz, and the rotational CO(1-0) transition has a rest frequency of 115 GHz, the current measurements trace galaxy formation at redshifts between z = 2.4 and 3.4, during "the epoch of galaxy assembly." The current limits, forecasts, and modeling at these redshifts is discussed in Chung et al (2022), while a future phase of COMAP, targeting "the epoch of reionization," is discussed in Breysse et al (2022). The use of this instrument for a galactic survey is presented in Rennie et al (2022).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the first-season COMAP instrument observes at frequencies between 26 and 34 GHz, and the rotational CO(1-0) transition has a rest frequency of 115 GHz, the current measurements trace galaxy formation at redshifts between z = 2.4 and 3.4, during "the epoch of galaxy assembly." The current limits, forecasts, and modeling at these redshifts is discussed in Chung et al (2022), while a future phase of COMAP, targeting "the epoch of reionization," is discussed in Breysse et al (2022). The use of this instrument for a galactic survey is presented in Rennie et al (2022).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Key requirements for the instrument have been informed by continuing theoretical simulations (Breysse et al 2022;Chung et al 2022), while the pipeline analysis (Foss et al 2022) and science data processing (Ihle et al 2022;Rennie et al 2022) have been crucial in evaluating performance, detecting problems, and verifying fixes. Since the first season of observations, several improvements have been made, such as upgrading LNA modules, installing two-stage polarizers on all feeds, and repairing faulty components.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to our fiducial model, which, as we noted toward the end of Section 2.2, is a conservative estimate by the very nature of data-driven priors based on direct-detection measurements, we also consider the signal estimate derived from the empirical CO model of Keating et al (2020a). This model, which we label "Li et al (2016)- Keating et al (2020a)" to distinguish it from the COPSS-based shot-noise estimate also calculated by Keating et al (2020a), is also one of the primary models that Breysse et al (2022a) use for COMAP forecasts beyond the Pathfinder. The model borrows the general approach of Li et al (2016), which composes the simulationand data-driven halo mass-SFR connection from Behroozi et al (2013aBehroozi et al ( , 2013b with an empirical IR-CO luminosity fit but uses newer (albeit exclusively local) IR-CO correlation fits from Kamenetzky et al (2016).…”
Section: Current Predictions For Detection Significancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, our priors around the CO model are fairly loose, whereas some real-world analyses like those of Keating et al (2020a) or some Fisher analyses like those of Breysse et al (2022a) make stronger assumptions about the shape of the L(M h ) relation-which then completely determines at least the line bias -and constrain only the overall normalization of L(M h ). In our Fisher forecastʼs parameter space this would be equivalent to imposing very narrow priors on b.…”
Section: Current Predictions For Detection Significancementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation