2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2020.115917
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Column versus batch methods for measuring PFOS and PFOA sorption to geomedia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

8
32
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
8
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Notably, the K d value for PFOA sorption by the sand with no SDS present is consistent with our prior measurements from batch and column isotherm experiments. 29 In addition, the results are consistent with those reported by other investigators who have conducted PFOA transport experiments with PFOA and the same sand, as discussed in Wang et al 31 The K d value for PFOA sorption by the sand with SDS = 1 μg/L is the same as that with no SDS present. This indicates that the presence of very low levels of SDS has no impact on PFOA sorption.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Notably, the K d value for PFOA sorption by the sand with no SDS present is consistent with our prior measurements from batch and column isotherm experiments. 29 In addition, the results are consistent with those reported by other investigators who have conducted PFOA transport experiments with PFOA and the same sand, as discussed in Wang et al 31 The K d value for PFOA sorption by the sand with SDS = 1 μg/L is the same as that with no SDS present. This indicates that the presence of very low levels of SDS has no impact on PFOA sorption.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Prior field sampling and mathematical modeling have demonstrated that soil and the vadose zone at many sites are primary reservoirs of PFAS that can serve as long-term sources to groundwater. ,,, The migration of PFAS in the soil profile and vadose zone can be influenced by multiple retention processes . The influence of sorption by soil on PFAS transport has been investigated in a number of studies. In addition, laboratory and modeling studies have illustrated that retention and transport of PFAS in unsaturated porous media can be significantly affected by adsorption at air–water interfaces. ,,,, Furthermore, it has long been established that the transport of hydrocarbon surfactants in unsaturated porous media is influenced by both solid-phase sorption and air–water interfacial adsorption. Therefore, the co-existence of hydrocarbon surfactants may have the potential to influence the retention and transport behavior of PFAS in the subsurface.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The R value measured for PFOS transport in the fully water-saturated system (no NAPL present) is 1.3 ( K d = 0.064 cm 3 /g). This K d value is consistent with that measured by batch and column isotherm experiments . An R of 1.3 was also measured for the PFOS column experiment conducted with TCE dissolved in solution but not present as residual NAPL.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The smaller R measured for the higher input concentration results from two factors. First, the sorption of PFOS by the sand is nonlinear, as demonstrated by prior batch and column isotherm measurements . Second, NAPL–water interfacial adsorption is nonlinear in this concentration range (see respective K i values in Table ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation