1983
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-9445(1983)109:10(2375)
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Column Rules of ACI, SSLC, and LRFD Compared

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…= primary moment (calculated without the second-order geometric effects) and j.L = C m l[1 -(PI<I>P cr )] = magnification factor, P cr = Ehr21L2, EI = effective bending stiffness of the column cross section, L = kl = effective column length (length of a supposedly equivalent hinged column), which is assumed to be constant during the loading process, k = factor determined by elastic buckling analysis of the column with the proper end restraints, <I> = strength reduction factor, and C m = coefficient introducing the effect of the distribution of the primary (initial) bending moment between the column ends, taken by ACI as C m = 1. For the purpose of comparison, we consider the case <I> = 1 (MacGregor 1986;Bazant and Cedolin 1991;Furlong 1983 …”
Section: Comparison With Aci Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…= primary moment (calculated without the second-order geometric effects) and j.L = C m l[1 -(PI<I>P cr )] = magnification factor, P cr = Ehr21L2, EI = effective bending stiffness of the column cross section, L = kl = effective column length (length of a supposedly equivalent hinged column), which is assumed to be constant during the loading process, k = factor determined by elastic buckling analysis of the column with the proper end restraints, <I> = strength reduction factor, and C m = coefficient introducing the effect of the distribution of the primary (initial) bending moment between the column ends, taken by ACI as C m = 1. For the purpose of comparison, we consider the case <I> = 1 (MacGregor 1986;Bazant and Cedolin 1991;Furlong 1983 …”
Section: Comparison With Aci Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The existing simple methods generally either assume or imply the deflection curve of the column to be sinusoidal (Broms and Viest 1958a,b,c;McGregor et al 1970;Furlong 1983Furlong , 1993"Building" 1989;"CBB-FIP" 1988). A major assumption in the ACI code procedure and other current design approaches is that an inelastic column with end restraints can be replaced by an equivalent hinged column of sinusoidal deflection curve.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the past, there were a large number of studies carried out on HSS columns filled with normal concrete [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9]. These studies have contributed a lot to the development and revision of currently well-known design codes, such as ACI [10], AISC [11], EC4 [12] and DBJ13-51-2003 [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of the widely use of concrete-filled steel tube (CFST) structure, lots of research have been done by Schneider, Bridge, Han and others [1][2][3][4][5]. CFST members generally are divided into two types: square and circular.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%