2010
DOI: 10.1080/14786435.2010.524900
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Colourings of lattices and coincidence site lattices

Abstract: The relationship between the coincidence indices of a lattice Γ 1 and a sublattice Γ 2 of Γ 1 is examined via the colouring of Γ 1 that is obtained by assigning a unique colour to each coset of Γ 2 . In addition, the idea of colour symmetry, originally defined for symmetries of lattices, is extended to coincidence isometries of lattices. An example involving the Ammann-Beenker tiling is provided to illustrate the results in the quasicrystal setting.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Aperiodic tilings are now studied and classified using advanced topological tools, as explained by Franz Ga¨hler [24]; and new methods are being devised for the generation of icosahedral tilings, as described by Nobuhisa Fujita [25]. Traditional theories of color symmetry [26] and magnetic order [27,28] have been generalized to deal with imperfect and partial coloring, as we saw in the presentations of Peter Zeiner [29] and Louise de Las Pen˜as [30], and in a new model of frustrated antiferromagnetic order on the Penrose tiling that was presented by Anu Jagannathan [31]. But probably most exciting is the fact that diffraction theory has gained much progress, bringing us closer than ever to the point where we can understand what constitutes a crystal [32,33], namely, what sets of points in space give rise to Bragg peaks in their diffraction [34].…”
Section: Advances In Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aperiodic tilings are now studied and classified using advanced topological tools, as explained by Franz Ga¨hler [24]; and new methods are being devised for the generation of icosahedral tilings, as described by Nobuhisa Fujita [25]. Traditional theories of color symmetry [26] and magnetic order [27,28] have been generalized to deal with imperfect and partial coloring, as we saw in the presentations of Peter Zeiner [29] and Louise de Las Pen˜as [30], and in a new model of frustrated antiferromagnetic order on the Penrose tiling that was presented by Anu Jagannathan [31]. But probably most exciting is the fact that diffraction theory has gained much progress, bringing us closer than ever to the point where we can understand what constitutes a crystal [32,33], namely, what sets of points in space give rise to Bragg peaks in their diffraction [34].…”
Section: Advances In Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2.2] (with u = 1 in the notation used there). Note that this result is the basis of the concept of colour coincidences; compare [65,63,67].…”
Section: Similar Submodulesmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Whereas the second statement of Lemma 7.9 can be generalised immediately, the first claim of Theorem 7.25 requires a different approach, as we generally lack the notion of a dual module. The proof is algebraic in nature and can be found in [98]; compare also [65], where a similar approach for lattices is described. 7.6.…”
Section: 5mentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations