1999
DOI: 10.1038/18335
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Colour categories in a stone-age tribe

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

8
218
0
5

Year Published

2002
2002
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 339 publications
(237 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
8
218
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…The paradigm has previously shown that English speakers demonstrate CP by more accurate cross-category than withincategory discrimination (Pilling et al, 2003) and that Berinmo speakers show CP for the boundary between nol and wor (Davidoff, Davies & Roberson, 1999). As with the similarity judgments, comparisons are made between Himba and Berinmo judgments for the Himba and the Berinmo boundaries.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The paradigm has previously shown that English speakers demonstrate CP by more accurate cross-category than withincategory discrimination (Pilling et al, 2003) and that Berinmo speakers show CP for the boundary between nol and wor (Davidoff, Davies & Roberson, 1999). As with the similarity judgments, comparisons are made between Himba and Berinmo judgments for the Himba and the Berinmo boundaries.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This ability to streamline processing applies to various types of input, both linguistic and nonlinguistic in nature (Harnad, 1987). Evidence that these categories affect listeners' treatment of perceptual stimuli has been found in diverse areas such as color perception (Davidoff et al, 1999), facial expressions (Angeli et al, 2008;Calder et al, 1996), familiar faces (Beale & Keil, 1995), artificial categories of objects (Goldstone et al, 2001), speech perception (Liberman et al, 1957;Kuhl, 1991), and even emotions (Hess et al, 2009;Sauter et al, 2011). Two core tendencies are found across these domains: a sharp shift in the identification function between category centers, and higher rates of discrimination for stimuli from different categories than for stimuli from a single category.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Do differences between languages cause systematic differences in the cognition of their speakers? Questions about the relationship between language and thought are among the most controversial in cognitive science (Boroditsky, 2001;Davidoff et al, 1999;Gentner & Goldin-Meadow, 2003;Gumperz & Levinson, 1996;Levinson et al, 2002;Li & Gleitman, 2002;Pinker, 1994;Rosch Heider, 1972). Theoretical proposals concerning the nature of this relationship run the gamut from suggestions that individual languages strongly influence their speakers cognition (Davidoff et al, 1999;Levinson, 2003;Whorf, 1956) to suggestions that there is no causal relationship between speakers' language and their cognition (Fodor, 1975;Li & Gleitman, 2002;Pinker, 1994), with a number of more moderate proposals falling between these extremes (Gentner, 2003;Kay & Kempton, 1984;Slobin, 1996).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%