Colorectal stenting for palliation and bridge to surgery of obstructing cancer

Frazzoni, Leonardo; Fabbri, Enrica; Bazzoli, Franco; Triantafyllou, Konstantinos; Fuccio, Lorenzo

doi:10.1016/j.tige.2020.03.010

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 56 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In terms of type of colonic stents, 3 meta-analyses have compared U-SEMS and C-SEMS, noting similar technical and clinical success, but U-SEMSs were associated with fewer overall AEs, including less tumor overgrowth, lower migration rates, longer patency, and fewer re-insertions, although at the cost of higher risk of tumor ingrowth [ 121 , 122 , 123 ]. The main complications included perforation, stent failure, stent migration, and stent re-obstruction [ 124 ]. Migration should be treated with stent replacement or SIS technique in the palliative setting, and early surgery in the bridge-to-surgery patients [ 125 ].…”

Section: Colonic Stentingmentioning

confidence: 99%

Best Practices in Esophageal, Gastroduodenal, and Colonic Stenting

Medas

Ferreira‐Silva

Girotra

et al. 2022

GE Port J Gastroenterol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Endoscopic stenting is an area of endoscopy that has witnessed noteworthy advancements over the last decade, resulting in evolving clinical practices among gastroenterologists around the world. Indications for endoscopic stenting have progressively expanded, becoming a frequent part of the management algorithm for various benign and malignant conditions of the gastrointestinal tract, from esophagus to rectum. In addition to expanded indications, continuous technological enhancements and development of novel endoscopic stents have resulted in an increased success of these approaches and, in some cases, allowed new applications. This review aimed to summarize best practices in esophageal, gastroduodenal, and colonic stenting.

show abstract