Colorectal liver metastases: regional chemotherapy via transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) and hepatic chemoperfusion: an update

Vogl, Thomas J.; Zangos, Stephan; Eichler, Katrin; Yakoub, Danny; Nabil, Mohamed

doi:10.1007/s00330-006-0372-5

Cited by 126 publications

(79 citation statements)

References 61 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The lipophilic nature of Lipiodol has the advantage of delivering the drugs directly to the targeted liver cells. 12 The embolizing agents administered significantly reduce flow through the relevant hepatic artery branch, although total occlusion is not achieved. Therefore, this significantly increases the time that the tumour cells are exposed to the chemotherapeutic agents and also increases the effective local concentration of these agents, thereby enhancing the activity of these agents.…”

Section: Current Trends In Interventional Treatment Of Colorectal Canmentioning

confidence: 99%

Current strategies in interventional oncology of colorectal liver metastases

Gruber‐Rouh

Marko

Thalhammer

et al. 2016

BJR

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The adequate treatment of non-resectable liver metastases from colorectal cancer which are resistant to systemic chemotherapy currently provides a great challenge. The aim is to identify and review key strategies in the treatment of colorectal liver metastases. A search for current literature on the topic of interventional strategies for colorectal metastases was performed in Medline in order to achieve this goal. Studies before 2005 and with ,20 patients treated for colorectal metastases were excluded. Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), transarterial embolization and selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT) were identified as examples of regional strategies for colorectal liver metastases, utilizing the unique blood supply of the liver. Radiofrequency ablation (RFA), microwave ablation (MWA) and cryoablation were selected as examples for currently available ablative techniques. Median survival in the key studies reviewed ranged from 7.7 to 28.6 for TACE, 8.3-12.6 for SIRT, 8.2-53.2 for RFA and 29-43 months for MWA. After review of the literature, it can be concluded that interventional oncologic therapies are a safe and effective method for treating colorectal liver metastases. The use of new chemotherapeutic agents for local therapy and new ablation technologies and techniques may increase patient survival and allows a neoadjuvant therapy setting. In addition, a combination of local therapies may be used to increase effectiveness in the future, which is subject to further research. INTRODUCTIONColorectal cancer is one of the most common cancers that shows fatal progression.1 Colorectal carcinoma most commonly metastasises to the liver due to haematogenous spread.2 At the time of diagnosis, 20-30% of patients have liver metastases, and during the course of disease, up to 60% of patients develop hepatic metastases.3 Although surgical excision is the first-line treatment for colorectal metastases, only 10-25% of patients are candidates for surgical resection. 4 Neoadjuvant systemic chemotherapy only allows 10-30% of patients with unresectable colorectal liver metastases sufficient downsizing for resection.

show abstract

Section: Current Trends In Interventional Treatment Of Colorectal Canmentioning

confidence: 99%

Current strategies in interventional oncology of colorectal liver metastases

Gruber‐Rouh

Marko

Thalhammer

et al. 2016

BJR

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…[57][58][59] This suggests that sequential TACE with preoperative PVE could also be potentially beneficial in patients with colorectal metastases. To date, however, no study has reported the using of sequential TACE with preoperative PVE in this category of patients.…”

Section: Sequential Tace and Pvementioning

confidence: 99%

Induction of Tumor Growth After Preoperative Portal Vein Embolization: Is It a Real Problem?

et al. 2008

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Although preoperative portal vein embolization (PVE) is an effective means to increase future remnant liver (FRL) volume, little has been published on possible adverse effects. This review discusses the clinical and experimental evidence regarding the effect of PVE on tumor growth in both embolized and nonembolized liver lobes, as well as potential strategies to control tumor progression after PVE. A literature review was performed using MEDLINE with keywords related to experimental and clinical studies concerning PVE, portal vein ligation (PVL), and tumor growth. Cross-references and references from reviews were also checked. Clinical and experimental data suggest that tumor progression can occur after preoperative PVE in embolized and nonembolized liver segments. Clinical evidence indicating possible tumor progression in patients with colorectal metastases or with primary liver tumors is based on studies with small sample size. Although multiple studies demonstrated tumor progression, evidence concerning a direct increase in tumor growth rate as a result of PVE is circumstantial. Three possible mechanisms influencing tumor growth after PVE can be recognized, namely changes in cytokines or growth factors, alteration in hepatic blood supply and an enhanced cellular host response promoting local tumor growth after PVE. Post-PVE chemotherapy and sequential transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) before PVE have been proposed to reduce tumor mass after PVE. We conclude that tumor progression can occur after PVE in patients with colorectal metastases as well as in patients with primary liver tumors. However, further research is needed in order to rate this risk of tumor progression after PVE.Preoperative portal vein embolization (PVE) is an accepted intervention in patients requiring major liver resection in whom the estimated future remnant liver (FRL) is too small to allow safe resection.1,2 PVE induces atrophy of the embolized, tumor-bearing liver lobe while compensatory hypertrophy of the nonembolized lobe occurs, thereby increasing FRL volume and function.

show abstract

“…The concept of TACE has been used in the management of patients with liver metastases from colorectal cancer, breast carcinoma as well as patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). [12][13][14][15][16][17] Regarding unresectable CCC there are few studies addressing this issue, and the number of patients on the existing studies is relatively small. Another problem is that there are no studies about patients who were treated with Mitomycin C, Gemcitabine, Cisplatin or with a combination of them.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Transarterial chemoembolization in the treatment of patients with unresectable cholangiocarcinoma: Results and prognostic factors governing treatment success

Vogl

Naguib

Nour-Eldin

et al. 2011

Intl Journal of Cancer

Self Cite

126

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The aim of the study was to evaluate the effectiveness of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) with four chemotherapeutic protocols in terms of local tumor control and survival of patients with unresectable cholangiocarcinoma (CCC) and to identify the prognostic factors governing treatment success. In the single-centre study, 115 patients (mean ages 5 60.4 years) with unresectable CCC were repeatedly treated with TACE. In total, 819 chemoembolization sessions were performed in 4 week intervals with a mean of 7.1 (range, 3-30) sessions per patient. The chemotherapeutic used was Mitomycin C only in 20.9% of patients, Gemcitabine only in 7%, Mitomycin C with Gemcitabine in 47% and combination of Gemcitabine, Mitomycin C and Cisplatin in 25.1%. Local tumor response was evaluated by MRI according to RECIST. Survival data were calculated according to the Kaplan-Meier method. Prognostic factors for patient's survival were evaluated using log-rank-test. The local tumor controls were: partial response 8.7%, stable disease 57.4% and progressive disease 33.9% of patients. The median and mean survival times from the start of TACE were 13 and 20.8 months. Survival rate from the start of TACE was 52% after 1-year, 29% after 2-years and 10% after 3-years. Initial tumor response, high tumor vascularity and Child-Pugh class A were statistically significant factors for patient's survival. No statistically significant difference between patients treated with different chemotherapy protocols was noted. In conclusion, TACE is a palliative and safe treatment option for patients with unresectable CCC. Child Pugh class B, tumor hypovascularity and initially progressive disease were poor prognostic factors for patient survival.Cholangiocarcinoma (CCC) is the second most common primary hepatic malignancy following hepatocellular carcinoma. 1 The tumor represents less than 2-3% of all cancers and up to 19% of primary liver cancers worldwide. [1][2][3][4] In Europe and North America, the average incidence of CCC is 1-2/100,000 per year. 5,6 The incidence during the last years is increasing, and this increasing incidence is associated with an increase in mortality. 2,7-10 Because of an advanced nature of the tumor on the time of first diagnosis, the therapeutic options for patients with unresectable CCC are limited.Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) is a local, catheter-based, minimally invasive therapeutic option for unresectable liver tumors, and is defined as a selective administration of chemotherapy usually combined with embolization of the vascular supply of the tumor. 11 For patients with liver tumors, TACE, as a combination of local-arterial application of chemotherapeutic drugs with additional usage of embolization particles, is an effective and recommended treatment. The concept of TACE has been used in the management of patients with liver metastases from colorectal cancer, breast carcinoma as well as patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). [12][13][14][15][16][17] Regarding unresectable CCC there are few...

show abstract

Colorectal liver metastases: regional chemotherapy via transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) and hepatic chemoperfusion: an update

Cited by 126 publications

References 61 publications

Current strategies in interventional oncology of colorectal liver metastases

Current strategies in interventional oncology of colorectal liver metastases

Induction of Tumor Growth After Preoperative Portal Vein Embolization: Is It a Real Problem?

Transarterial chemoembolization in the treatment of patients with unresectable cholangiocarcinoma: Results and prognostic factors governing treatment success

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About