Abstract:Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second most commonly diagnosed cancer among females and third among males worldwide. It also contributes significantly to cancer-related deaths, despite the continuous progress in diagnostic and therapeutic methods. Biomarkers currently play an important role in the detection and treatment of patients with colorectal cancer. Risk stratification for screening might be augmented by finding new biomarkers which alone or as a complement of existing tests might recognize either the pr… Show more
“…To this end, some investigators have proposed that a composite biomarker profile that combines clinical factors (CEA and CA19‐9) with pathological biomarkers may improve the accuracy of prognostic models and guide treatment in patients with resected ICC . The potential of this approach has been proven with the recent successes of biomarker based prediction in breast cancer and colorectal cancer …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…34 The potential of this approach has been proven with the recent successes of biomarker based prediction in breast cancer and colorectal cancer. 35,36 Results of the current study should be interpreted in the context of several limitations. The inclusion of multiple centers did not allow for the standardization of operative approach or treatment-based protocols.…”
While the Wang nomogram had the best discriminatory ability relative to OS and DFS, no ICC staging system or nomogram demonstrated excellent prognostic discrimination. The AJCC staging for ICC performed reasonably, although its overall discrimination was only modest-to-good.
“…To this end, some investigators have proposed that a composite biomarker profile that combines clinical factors (CEA and CA19‐9) with pathological biomarkers may improve the accuracy of prognostic models and guide treatment in patients with resected ICC . The potential of this approach has been proven with the recent successes of biomarker based prediction in breast cancer and colorectal cancer …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…34 The potential of this approach has been proven with the recent successes of biomarker based prediction in breast cancer and colorectal cancer. 35,36 Results of the current study should be interpreted in the context of several limitations. The inclusion of multiple centers did not allow for the standardization of operative approach or treatment-based protocols.…”
While the Wang nomogram had the best discriminatory ability relative to OS and DFS, no ICC staging system or nomogram demonstrated excellent prognostic discrimination. The AJCC staging for ICC performed reasonably, although its overall discrimination was only modest-to-good.
“…KRAS mutations were frequently detected in systemic metastatic cancers, and these were newly detected after acquired resistance to anti-EGFR antibody. Recently, mutation analysis using peripheral blood-socalled liquid biopsy-has been applied to colorectal cancer [9,10,[23][24][25]. In most published reports, quantitative PCR and BEAMing were used for detection with plasma DNA.…”
KRAS mutations have been recognized as predictive markers of primary resistance to anti-EGFR-antibodies in colorectal cancer patients. In addition, newly detected KRAS mutations have been reported to be related with acquired resistance to chemotherapy containing anti-EGFR antibody. Considering this evidence, monitoring of KRAS mutations is indispensable for making treatment decisions, and the method should be non-invasive allowing repeated examinations. Recently, we established a novel automated sensitive detection system for KRAS mutations, named mutation-biased PCR quenching probe system (MBP-QP). The goal of our study was to investigate the potential for monitoring KRAS mutations during treatment with anti-EGFR antibodies. The detection limit of MBP-QP using a control plasmid containing KRAS mutations was 1-9 copies, and 0.05-0.3% mutant plasmid was detectable in a mixture of wild type and mutants. One-hundred twenty colorectal cancer patients were genotyped for KRAS mutations with MBP-QP as well as polymerase chain reaction reverse sequence-specific oligonucleotide (PCR-rSSO), which has already been applied to cancer tissue samples in the clinical setting. Concordance rates between plasma DNA and cancer tissues were 68% with MBP-QP and 66% with PCR-rSSO, indicating that these systems are equivalent in terms of detecting KRAS mutations with plasma DNA. KRAS mutations in plasma DNA were frequently observed in systemic metastatic cancer patients, and in three patients KRAS mutations appeared after chemotherapy containing anti-EGFR antibody. A prospective study is needed for clarifying whether KRAS mutations detected in plasma DNA are predictive markers of treatment efficacy with anti-EGFR antibody.
“…Además de la mutación del gen KRAS, las mutaciones de PIK3CA y PTEN pueden ser predictivas de falta de efectividad del tratamiento anti-EGFR en el cáncer colorrectal metastásico 98,99 (tabla 4). Se reporta que hasta en 24 % de los pacientes con gen KRAS nativo, se presentan mutaciones en los genes PIK3CA o BRAF 100,101 .…”
Section: Utilidad De La Valoración Del Estado De Los Genes En La Prácunclassified
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.