2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2017.04.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Colorectal cancer screening: Recommendations for physicians and patients from the U.S. Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

9
546
1
22

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 427 publications
(578 citation statements)
references
References 153 publications
(204 reference statements)
9
546
1
22
Order By: Relevance
“…Given the significant proportion of subjects using these drugs and the renewing scientific evidence on this topic, guideline adjustments should be considered. Although this has been an ongoing discussion,37 still no recommendations were made in the latest update of the US Multi-Society Task Force CRC screening guidelines 35…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the significant proportion of subjects using these drugs and the renewing scientific evidence on this topic, guideline adjustments should be considered. Although this has been an ongoing discussion,37 still no recommendations were made in the latest update of the US Multi-Society Task Force CRC screening guidelines 35…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11 The increased incidence of CRC in individuals younger than 50 years has provided the impetus for some societies to revise current screening guidelines to begin earlier screening. 10,14 In this study, we examined the National Cancer Data Base (NCDB) registry to determine whether recent trends seen in CRC in young adults agreed with those found via the SEER database. 13 However, other organizations, including the US Preventive Services Task Force and the major US gastroenterology associations, have not yet changed their recommendations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is controversy regarding the prevalence of SSAs, which differs among previously published studies, varying from 2%-10% [13,17,18,23,24] . In our institution, the prevalence of SSAs was approximately 2%, which is lower than previously reported results in Western populations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%