2022
DOI: 10.1016/s2214-109x(22)00231-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Colorectal cancer screening in sub-Saharan Africa

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The reason for lower survival in the younger age group remains unaddressed but suggests the possibility of more aggressive tumour types and delays in diagnosis [ 26 ]. This raises questions about whether biological factors might contribute to these differences [ 27 29 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reason for lower survival in the younger age group remains unaddressed but suggests the possibility of more aggressive tumour types and delays in diagnosis [ 26 ]. This raises questions about whether biological factors might contribute to these differences [ 27 29 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…South Korea and Japan are regarded as the second category of developed neighboring countries, both with 2 times higher per capita GDPs and 1.3–1.8 times higher CRC prevalence than that of China; in these two countries, nationally organized CRC screenings also exist and FOBT is applied as the primary test 30,31 . Moreover, we tried to make a comparison among the BRICS countries (Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa) regarding the comparable population size and economics 32–34 ; however, based on limited information, it seemed that none of them has existed national organized CRC screening. To sum up, the experiences of scaling‐up organized CRC screening will be learned from the developed countries than the less developed ones, and the economic related restriction would be the main challenges for China to implement a nationally organized CRC program that provides routine screening as other countries.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Notably, a follow-up colonoscopy for a positive result is likely to be cost prohibitive; in Ghana, it was estimated to cost between 300 and 1000 GH¢ [ 41 ]. In addition, most countries in Africa do not have well-established health insurance systems to cover the cost of care [ 42 ]. However, enrolment in comprehensive insurance plans is positively associated with screening for breast and prostate cancers, demonstrating the effect of one’s financial status on seeking screening [ 43 , 44 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%