2022
DOI: 10.1007/s10151-022-02574-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Colorectal cancer outcomes determined by mode of presentation: analysis of population data in England between 2010 and 2014

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 18 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The presentation of the disease and the decision of the type of surgical and oncological approach depend on the time of diagnosis or severity of the cancer manifestation; as reported by Franklyn et al 31 on the frequency of emergency first contact presentation among undiagnosed cancer patients living in remote areas, compared to control groups (27.7% vs. 19.7%, p < 0.01) 31 . In this order of ideas, the results obtained in this study are congruent with the conditions under which the patients were evaluated, and differ slightly in some aspects, which are typical of the progress in public policies and programs for early detection and specialized management of colorectal cancer, established in high‐income countries.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The presentation of the disease and the decision of the type of surgical and oncological approach depend on the time of diagnosis or severity of the cancer manifestation; as reported by Franklyn et al 31 on the frequency of emergency first contact presentation among undiagnosed cancer patients living in remote areas, compared to control groups (27.7% vs. 19.7%, p < 0.01) 31 . In this order of ideas, the results obtained in this study are congruent with the conditions under which the patients were evaluated, and differ slightly in some aspects, which are typical of the progress in public policies and programs for early detection and specialized management of colorectal cancer, established in high‐income countries.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%