1996
DOI: 10.1016/s0748-7983(96)92320-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Colorectal cancer—a multivariate analysis of prognostic factors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
24
0
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
2
24
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Overall survival decreased in patients older than 70 years in this study; other groups reported similar results (11,13,14). The significance of age has been frequently reviewed and yet remains controversial.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Overall survival decreased in patients older than 70 years in this study; other groups reported similar results (11,13,14). The significance of age has been frequently reviewed and yet remains controversial.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…Previous studies have analysed clinicopathological variables such as age (over 70 years), gender, size, vascular invasion and tumour stage (11,12) However, in this study we have also added plasma big ET-1 levels as a clinical variable available prior to surgery. A plasma level of >4.2 pg/mL was chosen, as this was the upper limit of big ET-1 levels in age-and sex-matched controls (Fig.…”
Section: Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, different age ranges of the populations studied, or different age groups chosen for the analyses, together with a variable prevalence of nonneoplastic diseases in the evaluated series, can explain the discordant results in the scientific literature regarding age and colorectal cancer. Indeed, different authors have found an independent unfavourable effect of increasing age (Korenaga et al, 1991;Gasser et al, 1992;Crocetti et al, 1996;D'Eredita et al, 1996;Wolters et al, 1996;Payne and Meyer, 1997;Tominaga et al, 1997;Heys et al, 1998;Lagautriere et al, 1998;Fietkau et al, 2004;Munemoto et al, 2004), of the youngest and oldest age ranges, indifferently (Chung et al, 1998;Cerottini et al, 1999;Massacesi et al, 2002) or even of young age (Cai et al, 2005), while other investigators were not able to demonstrate any prognostic effect at all (Ponz de Leon et al, 1992;Wang et al, 2000;Mitry et al, 2004;Latkauskas et al, 2005). Only JanssenHeijnen et al (2005) evaluated relative survival of patients with several cancers, utilising data from the Southern Netherlands Cancer Registry.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CRC is staged according to the extent of primary organ involvement and metastatic spread to lymph nodes or distant organs (4)(5)(6)(7). Stage II (no lymph node or distant metastases) cancer patients have a 5-year survival of 75% to 80% when surgically treated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%