2005
DOI: 10.1002/ajp.20202
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Color vision in marmosets and tamarins: behavioral evidence

Abstract: Here we demonstrate differences in the relative performance of 15 callitrichids tested in a series of color visual discrimination experiments. Munsell color chips were chosen as stimuli based on their use in earlier experiments with human dichromats. We show behavioral evidence for the existence of four distinct kinds of color-vision phenotypes, each of which has slightly different color discrimination abilities. The different phenotypes may offer different advantages. The data are in accordance with the exist… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
12
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This opens up a large range of possibilities for future experiments testing the visual abilities or reef fish, similar to what has been done with goldfish (Neumeyer, 1984;Neumeyer et al, 1991;Neumeyer, 1992). Such associative learning had not been described in marine fish before but has been used to test colour vision in a range of other animals, including insects (Shafir, 1996;Nakamura and Yamashita, 2000;Hempel de Ibarra et al, 2001;Lehrer and Campan, 2004), freshwater fish (Schiemenz, 1924;Neumeyer, 1984;Ohnishi, 1991;Neumeyer, 1992), crustaceans (Marshall et al, 1996), birds (Peiponen, 1992;Swaddle and Johnson, 2007), marsupials (Hemmi, 1999) and primates (Pessoa et al, 2003;Pessoa et al, 2005a;Pessoa et al, 2005b). So it is perhaps not surprising that reef fish also showed the ability for associative learning.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…This opens up a large range of possibilities for future experiments testing the visual abilities or reef fish, similar to what has been done with goldfish (Neumeyer, 1984;Neumeyer et al, 1991;Neumeyer, 1992). Such associative learning had not been described in marine fish before but has been used to test colour vision in a range of other animals, including insects (Shafir, 1996;Nakamura and Yamashita, 2000;Hempel de Ibarra et al, 2001;Lehrer and Campan, 2004), freshwater fish (Schiemenz, 1924;Neumeyer, 1984;Ohnishi, 1991;Neumeyer, 1992), crustaceans (Marshall et al, 1996), birds (Peiponen, 1992;Swaddle and Johnson, 2007), marsupials (Hemmi, 1999) and primates (Pessoa et al, 2003;Pessoa et al, 2005a;Pessoa et al, 2005b). So it is perhaps not surprising that reef fish also showed the ability for associative learning.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Much has been discussed with respect to the differential advantages of dichromats and trichromats in discriminating colored targets, however no consensus has been yet reached. Behavioral studies have categorically publicized that New World trichromats, but not dichromats, discriminate sets of colored lights (Jacobs et al,'87;Tovée et al,'92) and papers (Gomes et al, 2002;Pessoa et al, 2005c;Araújo et al, 2008;Prado et al, 2008), and present advantages relating conspicuous food acquisition in naturalistic conditions (Caine and Mundy, 2000;Smith et al, 2003b). However, with few exceptions (Lucas et al, 2003), behavioral field data have not given enough support to these trichromatic perceptual advantages Smith et al, 2003a;Vogel et al, 2007;Melin et al, 2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…According to our results on colour discrimination by human dichromats and trichromats, and based on Folia Primatol 2008;79:172-184 what is known about platyrrhines' colour vision, it is plausible to suppose that females SF1, SF2, SF3 and SF4 are trichromats [Pessoa et al, 2005c]. Considering that there may be more than 3 trichromatic phenotypes in Saimiri [Cropp et al, 2002] and that each phenotype could render slightly different colour perceptions, it is possible to think that, since they could only discriminate significantly one 'difficult pair', trichromatic females SF1 and SF4 have narrowly spaced photopigments, as happens in deuteranomaly [Mollon et al, 1984].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%