Abstract:Objectives:To evaluate the color, translucency and masking ability of a newly developed bulkfill resin composite with enhanced opacity.
Materials and Methods: A3 shade composite discs (n=20/material) (Filtek bulk-fill; FB andFiltek bulk-fill One; FBOne) were prepared at 2 and 4 mm thickness (n=10/thickness). Three different backgrounds (white tile, black tile, and C4 shade porcelain) and the intrinsic color for each material were used to determine the translucency parameter (between white and black backgrounds… Show more
“…However, compared to the airborne abrasion group, the bulk-fill demonstrated a significantly ( p <.001) higher bond strength value in sulfuric acid etching group. This difference could be attributed to two factors: first, the sulfuric acid produces sulfonate groups in PEEK polymer chains, which are then chemically cross-linked to the dental adhesives ( 32 , 33 ), and second, the translucency of bulk fill, which makes it easier to achieve a greater depth of cure and hence the bond strength ( 40 ). Furthermore, the close matching of the elastic modulus of bulk fill composite resin (11.6 GPa) to PEEK material (18.6 GPa) is one of the factors that could affect its bond strength because it uniformly distributes stresses and reduces their transmission to the restorations, thereby improving its adaptation ( 18 , 27 ).…”
Background
To evaluate the effect of surface treatments on adhesion of milled PEEK post to two different composite resin core-build up materials.
Material and Methods
Six PEEK posts were divided into the following groups: G1: no treatment+ Grandio core material, G2: no treatment+ Bulk-fill core material, G3: 98% sulfuric acid for 60 seconds+ Grandio core material, G4: 98% sulfuric acid for 60 seconds+ Bulk-fill core material, G5:
50 μm airborne particle abraded + Grandio core material, G6: 50 μm airborne particle abraded + bulk fill core material. The adhesion of the post to core build-up materials was tested using micro push-out bond strength. Data were analyzed using ANOVA and Tukey’s test.
Results
There was a significant effect for the surface treatment (
p
<.001), a non-significant effect for the core build-up materials (
p
<.289), and a significant effect for their interaction (
p
<.001) on the bond strength values.
Conclusions
Within the limitation of this study, sulfuric acid etching group significantly increased the bond strength compared to other groups. Bulk-fill core material could be a feasible option when restoring ETT in terms of saving chair time and the treatment procedure simplicity.
Key words:
Bond Strength, Core material, PEEK, Surface Treatment.
“…However, compared to the airborne abrasion group, the bulk-fill demonstrated a significantly ( p <.001) higher bond strength value in sulfuric acid etching group. This difference could be attributed to two factors: first, the sulfuric acid produces sulfonate groups in PEEK polymer chains, which are then chemically cross-linked to the dental adhesives ( 32 , 33 ), and second, the translucency of bulk fill, which makes it easier to achieve a greater depth of cure and hence the bond strength ( 40 ). Furthermore, the close matching of the elastic modulus of bulk fill composite resin (11.6 GPa) to PEEK material (18.6 GPa) is one of the factors that could affect its bond strength because it uniformly distributes stresses and reduces their transmission to the restorations, thereby improving its adaptation ( 18 , 27 ).…”
Background
To evaluate the effect of surface treatments on adhesion of milled PEEK post to two different composite resin core-build up materials.
Material and Methods
Six PEEK posts were divided into the following groups: G1: no treatment+ Grandio core material, G2: no treatment+ Bulk-fill core material, G3: 98% sulfuric acid for 60 seconds+ Grandio core material, G4: 98% sulfuric acid for 60 seconds+ Bulk-fill core material, G5:
50 μm airborne particle abraded + Grandio core material, G6: 50 μm airborne particle abraded + bulk fill core material. The adhesion of the post to core build-up materials was tested using micro push-out bond strength. Data were analyzed using ANOVA and Tukey’s test.
Results
There was a significant effect for the surface treatment (
p
<.001), a non-significant effect for the core build-up materials (
p
<.289), and a significant effect for their interaction (
p
<.001) on the bond strength values.
Conclusions
Within the limitation of this study, sulfuric acid etching group significantly increased the bond strength compared to other groups. Bulk-fill core material could be a feasible option when restoring ETT in terms of saving chair time and the treatment procedure simplicity.
Key words:
Bond Strength, Core material, PEEK, Surface Treatment.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.