The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2005
DOI: 10.1140/epjc/s2005-02243-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Color suppressed contributions to the decay modes $B_{d,s} \to D_{s,d} D_{s,d} $ , $B_{d,s} \to D_{s,d} D^*_{s,d}$ , and $B_{d,s} \to D^*_{s,d} D^*_{s,d} $

Abstract: The amplitudes for decays of the typehave relatively small factorizable contributions through the annihilation mechanism. The dominant contributions to the decay amplitudes arise from chiral loop contributions and tree level amplitudes which can be obtained in terms of soft gluon emissions forming a gluon condensate. We predict that the branching ratios for the processesB. We obtain branching ratios for two D * 's in the final state of order two times bigger.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
13
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As the slope of the IW function is steeper than the one used in, say, Ref. [18], the partial amplitudes for B → DD depending on the IW function, might be overestimated there. This will then have consequences for the size of the overall amplitude.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As the slope of the IW function is steeper than the one used in, say, Ref. [18], the partial amplitudes for B → DD depending on the IW function, might be overestimated there. This will then have consequences for the size of the overall amplitude.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Some versions of quark models [3,4,7] gave a slope ξ ′ (1) ≃ −0.4 to −0.3, which is not in agreement with general theoretical expectations expressed in Bjorken [12] and Uraltsev [13] sum rules which together imply −ξ ′ (1) ≥ 3/4. Also, a combined fit [14] to results of experimental measurements of B → D * lν decays gives −ξ ′ (1) = 1.16 ± 0.05, and, although dispersion of experimental results is large leading to a small confidence level of this fit (≈ 1%), it seems reasonable to assume that absolute value of the slope cannot be significantly smaller than 1. In this paper we propose a modified version of the model in [7], which has a particular feature of explicit inclusion of the gluon condensate effects, enabling consistent estimation of non-factorizable amplitudes [15,16,17,18,19], and we demonstrate that this model gives a satisfactory description of the IW function slope.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The LEET form factors ζ and ζ ⊥ , together with data for the D → π and D → ρ transitions, will determine the coupling constants G A and G V , which may be used in the calculation of nonfactorizable (color suppressed) nonleptonic D-meson decays, in the same manner as has previously been done for K → ππ [39,51], D → K 0K0 [52], B → DD [53,54], B → Dπ [40], and B → π 0 π 0 [41]. Then nonleptonic decay amplitudes can be written in terms of the LEET form factors ζ i , both for the factorized and the color-suppressed cases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The LEET form factors ζ and ζ ⊥ , together with data for the D → π and D → ρ transitions, will determine the coupling constants G A and G V , which may be used in the calculation of nonfactorizable (color suppressed) nonleptonic D-meson decays, in the same manner as has previously been done for K → ππ [39,51], D → K 0K0 [52], B → DD [53,54], B → Dπ [40], and B → π 0 π 0 [41]. Then nonleptonic decay amplitudes can be written in terms of the LEET form factors ζ i , both for the factorized and the color-suppressed cases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%