Color stability of dual‐cured and light‐cured resin cements: A systematic review and meta‐analysis of in vitro studies

Hardan, Louis; Bourgi, Rim; Hernández‐Escamilla, Triana; Piva, Evandro; Devoto, Walter; Lukomska‐Szymanska, Monika; Cuevas‐Suárez, Carlos Enrique

doi:10.1111/jopr.13757

Cited by 3 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 51 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In the comparison between the scanners, the TRIOS had similar accuracy and reproducibility with the Identica Blue. Although there was a subtle difference in accuracy based on the type of scanners, no significant differences were shown in the different simulated environmental conditions and accuracy was maintained between the scanners used.The systematic review with meta-analysis conducted byHardan et al (2023) investigated whether the accuracy of intraoral scanners is influenced by different scanning factors and conditions.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Factors influencing the efficiency of intraoral scanners in dental prosthesis: Narrative review

Ferro,

Almeida,

Pinto

et al. 2024

Current Challenges in Dentistry: Theory and Clinical Practice

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The objective of this literature review is to critically analyze the factors that influence the efficiency of intraoral scanners. Searches in electronic databases were performed using indexed keywords and free terms. The research was limited to full articles written in Portuguese and English and published in journals between 2011 and 2024. Intraoral scanning systems can be used reliably for diagnostic purposes and for short-span areas. However, for full-arc scanning, this system is more susceptible to distortion. Regarding the different scanner systems, the studies indicated variable results that do not allow a preference for the system to be realized. It is concluded that for the performance of prosthetic rehabilitation, the accuracy of the scanners is higher when the extension of the scan is reduced and when the scanned surfaces have minimal irregularities.

show abstract

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Factors influencing the efficiency of intraoral scanners in dental prosthesis: Narrative review

Ferro,

Almeida,

Pinto

et al. 2024

Current Challenges in Dentistry: Theory and Clinical Practice

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Two-year clinical performance of dual- and light-cure bulk-fill resin composites in Class ӀӀ restorations: a randomized clinical trial

Elawsya,

Montaser,

El-Wassefy

et al. 2024

Clin Oral Invest

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective This study aimed to compare the clinical performance of dual- and light-cure bulk-fill resin composites (BFRCs) in Class ӀӀ restorations after 2 years. Materials and methods A double-blinded, prospective, randomized clinical trial (RCT) was conducted following the CONSORT (Consolidated Standard of Reporting Trials) guidelines. Forty patients were enrolled in the study. Each patient received three compound Class ӀӀ restorations. One dual-cure (Fill-Up; Coltene Waledent AG) and two light-cure (QuiXfil; Dentsply, and Tetric N-Ceram Bulk Fill; Ivoclar Vivadent) BFRCs were used for 120 Class ӀӀ restorations. A universal adhesive (ONE COAT 7 UNIVERSAL; Coltene Waledent AG) was used with all restorations. Restorations were clinically evaluated after 1 week (baseline), 6 months, 12 months, 18 months, and finally after 24 months using the FDI World Dental Federation (FDI) criteria. The Kruskal–Wallis test was used for comparison between BFRCs groups at baseline and at each recall period, and the Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used for comparing different follow-up times of each BFRC to baseline. The level of significance was set at p < 0.05. Results All BFRCs restorations showed only minor changes and revealed no statistically significant differences between their clinical performance for all evaluated parameters at all recall periods; also, there was no statistically significant difference between all recall periods and baseline for all evaluated parameters. Conclusion The two-year clinical performance of dual-cure BFRC was comparable to light-cure BFRCs in Class ӀӀ restorations. Clinical relevance Dual- and light-cure BFRCs showed excellent clinical performance in Class ӀӀ restorations after a 2-year clinical follow-up.

show abstract

The Influence of Thickness on Light Transmission for Pre- and Fully Crystallized Chairside CAD/CAM Lithium Disilicate Ceramics

Floriani,

Abuhammoud,

Rojas-Rueda

et al. 2024

Materials

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Aim: This in vitro study aimed to compare the light-transmission properties of two chairside CAD/CAM lithium disilicate (LD) ceramics (a novel fully crystallized and a traditional pre-crystallized) across varying thicknesses. Materials and Methods: One hundred flat specimens were obtained from precrystallized (e.max CAD, Ivoclar Vivadent, Schaan, Liechtenstein) and fully crystallized (LiSi GC Block; GC, Tokyo, Japan) LD at five different thicknesses (0.5, 0.75, 1.0, 1.50 and 2.0 mm). All specimens were polished with a polishing system for lithium disilicate restorations following recommendations from the manufacturer. Light transmission was evaluated with a radiometer. The statistical analysis between e.max CAD and LiSi GC Block was performed using a Mann–Whitney test for each thickness at a significance level of 0.05 (p < 0.05), followed by a Kruskal–Wallis test to compare the light transmission between the thicknesses of e.max CAD and LiSi GC Block. Results: Light transmittance was significantly affected by ceramic thickness. The 0.5 mm thick specimens exhibited the highest transmittance values compared to all other groups, while a light transmittance of 0.00 was observed in the 2.0 mm thick specimens for both e.max CAD and LiSi GC Block. In the comparison between e.max CAD and LiSi GC Block according to thickness, there was a statistically significant difference exclusively between groups with a thickness of 1.50 mm (p = 0.002). Conclusions: Light transmission for pre- and fully crystallized CAD/CAM lithium disilicate ceramics only showed a statistical difference at the thickness of 1.50 mm (p = 0.002). E.max CAD demonstrated acceptable light transmission up to a thickness of 1.5 mm. Clinical Significance: A thickness of 2 mm for chairside CAD/CAM lithium disilicate ceramics, whether pre-crystallized or fully crystallized, necessitates the use of dual-cure resin luting cement due to reduced light transmission.

show abstract

Color stability of dual‐cured and light‐cured resin cements: A systematic review and meta‐analysis of in vitro studies

Cited by 3 publications

References 51 publications

Factors influencing the efficiency of intraoral scanners in dental prosthesis: Narrative review

Factors influencing the efficiency of intraoral scanners in dental prosthesis: Narrative review

Two-year clinical performance of dual- and light-cure bulk-fill resin composites in Class ӀӀ restorations: a randomized clinical trial

The Influence of Thickness on Light Transmission for Pre- and Fully Crystallized Chairside CAD/CAM Lithium Disilicate Ceramics

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About