2004
DOI: 10.1086/381119
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Color-selected Galaxies at z 6 in the Great Observatories Origins Deep Survey

Abstract: We report early results on galaxies at z ∼ 6, selected from Hubble Space Telescope imaging for the Great Observatories Origins Deep Survey. Spectroscopy of one object with the Advanced Camera for Surveys grism and from the Keck and VLT observatories a shows a strong continuum break and asymmetric line emission, identified as Lyα at z = 5.83. We detect only five spatially extended, z ∼ 6 candidates with signal-to-noise ratios > 10, two of which have spectroscopic confirmation. This is many fewer than would be e… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
296
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 247 publications
(304 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
(9 reference statements)
8
296
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A color selection similar to that in this paper and that of Bouwens et al (2003b) was performed by Dickinson et al (2004) in order to identify z % 6 candidates with a slightly bluer color cut criterion of (i 0 Àz 0 ) AB > 1:3, which may leave them susceptible to increased contamination from lower redshift galaxies. Rather than apply a strict magnitude limit, these authors have chosen to apply a cut based on object signal-tonoise ratio in their co-added images.…”
Section: Comparison With the Results Of The Goods Teammentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A color selection similar to that in this paper and that of Bouwens et al (2003b) was performed by Dickinson et al (2004) in order to identify z % 6 candidates with a slightly bluer color cut criterion of (i 0 Àz 0 ) AB > 1:3, which may leave them susceptible to increased contamination from lower redshift galaxies. Rather than apply a strict magnitude limit, these authors have chosen to apply a cut based on object signal-tonoise ratio in their co-added images.…”
Section: Comparison With the Results Of The Goods Teammentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, a large fraction of the z $ 6 candidates described in this paper and in Paper I do not form part of their survey. Dickinson et al (2004) identify only five candidate objects with signal-to-noise ratio greater than 10 in the combined GOODS-N and GOODS-S survey, of which three objects (in the GOODS-S field) were also selected in Paper I and the remaining GOODS-S object falls outside our color and magnitude cuts. The remaining candidate, NiD001, has colors that appear to vary significantly between epochs and averages across four epochs as too faint to appear in our selection.…”
Section: Comparison With the Results Of The Goods Teammentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our first galaxy sample contains 2422 galaxies with secure spectroscopic redshifts (z spec ) from the ESO public compilation in the Chandra Deep Field South (CDFS; Cristiani et al 2000;Croom et al 2001;Bunker et al 2003;Dickinson et al 2004;Stanway et al 2004aStanway et al , 2004bStrolger et al 2004;Szokoly et al 2004;van der Wel et al 2004;Doherty et al 2005;Le Fèvre et al 2005;Mignoli et al 2005;Ravikumar et al 2007;Popesso et al 2009;Balestra et al 2010;Silverman et al 2010;Kurk et al 2013;Vanzella et al 2014) and from Morris et al (2015). In order to obtain multiwavelength photometry for these galaxies, we cross-matched this sample with the public Cosmic Assembly Near-infrared Deep Extragalactic Legacy Survey (CANDELS; Grogin et al 2011;Koekemoer et al 2011) catalog for the Great Observatory Origins Deep Survey South field (GOODS-S) obtained by Guo et al (2013).…”
Section: Samplementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Stanway, we searched 150 arcmin 2 of the GOODS-South field (the Chandra Deep FieldSouth) to select (i ′ − z ′ ) AB > 1.5 objects, of which six were probable z > 5.7 galaxies brighter than z AB < 25.6. Subsequent papers by the GOODS team (Dickinson et al 2004;Giavalisco et al 2004) reproduced many of these i ′ -drop candidates. To address potential cosmic variance issues, we performed a similar analysis in the GOODS-North field, which yielded a consistent estimate of the surface density of z ≃ 6 star forming sources (Stanway et al 2004b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%