2000
DOI: 10.3758/bf03206913
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Color—luminance relationships and the McCollough effect

Abstract: The McCollough effect is an orientation-specific color aftereffect induced by adapting to colored gratings. We examined how the McCollougheffect depends on the relationships between color and luminance within the inducing and test gratings and compared the aftereffects to the color changes predicted from selective adaptation to different color-luminance combinations. Our results suggest that the important contingency underlying the McCollough effect is between orientation and colorluminance direction and are c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Yet the observed rotations imply a selective contrast loss of up to 50% (or more if perceived contrast also decreased along the orthogonal axis), while such large contrast changes were not subjectively evident during the experiment. Moreover, in matching tasks where both components were measured, we have observed significant hue and lightness aftereffects in test stimuli that are little changed in perceived contrast (see Webster & Malkoc, 2000, Figure 1). This raises the possibility that contrast, like hue angle, is represented by a distribution of activity across channels (Webster & Wilson, 2000).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…Yet the observed rotations imply a selective contrast loss of up to 50% (or more if perceived contrast also decreased along the orthogonal axis), while such large contrast changes were not subjectively evident during the experiment. Moreover, in matching tasks where both components were measured, we have observed significant hue and lightness aftereffects in test stimuli that are little changed in perceived contrast (see Webster & Malkoc, 2000, Figure 1). This raises the possibility that contrast, like hue angle, is represented by a distribution of activity across channels (Webster & Wilson, 2000).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…Yet how the effect is related to other cortical color aftereffects like the ME remains unclear. For example, color contrast adaptation is also selective for orientation [17, 18], and can result in hue biases reminiscent of the color shifts conventionally measured in the ME [14, 20]. However, it remains possible that it only plays a role in the transient component of the color biases in the ME [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In previous studies, color representation models used to analyze behavioral data in color noise masking and adaptation used the luminance axis with a linear scale (e.g. Gegenfurtner & Kiper, 1992 ; Giulianini & Eskew, 1998 ; Webster & Malkoc, 2000 ; Webster & Mollon, 1994 ). Therefore, the log-scale luminance axis used in our experiment makes it difficult to directly compare the models in these previous studies and our study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%