GIA began its 15-year study of diamond cut by using a computer to model the way light behaves within a round brilliant cut diamond. From this model, GIA researchers developed proportionbased metrics to predict how diamonds would perform with regard to brilliance and fire. Continued research revealed several important variables that could not be evaluated effectively by computer modeling alone. Thus, the authors asked diamond manufacturers, dealers, retailers, and potential consumers to evaluate brightness (a term selected as more appropriate than brilliance), fire, and overall cut appearance of diamonds representing many different proportion combinations. These observations and discussions confirmed that additional factors, besides brightness and fire, contribute to diamond cut appearance, and that factors in addition to face-up appearance are important in assessing the quality of a diamond's cut. With the trade interactions as a foundation, the authors (1) tested the brightness and fire metrics to find the best fit with human observations, (2) identified and quantified factors in addition to brightness and fire that contribute to face-up appearance, (3) developed a standard viewing environment that mimics common trade environments, (4) created the foundation for a comprehensive diamond cut grading system, and (5) began development of reference software to predict the overall cut grade of a particular diamond. The GIA diamond cut grading system described here includes the components of brightness, fire, scintillation, polish, and symmetry, as well as weight and durability concerns, into a single overall grade for cut quality for standard round brilliants.f the Four Cs (color, clarity, cut, and carat weight), cut is the least understood-and least agreed upon-aspect of diamond appearance. Current claims about the superiority of certain round brilliant diamond cuts focus mostly on three approaches:• The use of specific sets of proportions (e.g., those for the AGS 0, the AGA 1A, "Class 1" cuts [as previously taught by GIA Education], the HRD "Very Good" grades, "Ideal" cuts, and "Tolkowsky" cuts) • The use of viewing devices to see specific patterns or pattern elements in diamonds (e.g., FireScope, Symmetriscope, IdealScope, and various "Hearts-and-Arrows"-style viewers)• The use of proprietary devices, such as the GemEx BrillianceScope and ISEE2, which measure one or more of the following aspects of diamond appearance: brilliance, fire, scintillation, and/or symmetry For GIA's research on the evaluation of diamond cut, we started with a different approach, based on the following questions: What makes a round brilliant cut (RBC, figure 1) proportions create observable distinctions? Which proportion sets produce results that are deemed attractive by most experienced observers? The first stages of our research-which utilized advanced computer modeling-were described briefly by Manson (1991), and then in detail by Hemphill et al. (1998) and Reinitz et al. (2001).Many other groups have used some form of computer modeli...