1992
DOI: 10.2214/ajr.159.6.1332456
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Color flow Doppler characterization of focal hepatic lesions.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

5
51
2
1

Year Published

1998
1998
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
5
51
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Furtehrmore, in a more complex clinical setting, US may identify doubtful focal liver lesions during pre-surgical tumour staging or during post-surgical follow-up, or may detect hepatocellular nodules during surveillance for liver cirrhosis. Unenhanced grey-scale US and colour Doppler US present clear limitations in differentiating malignant from benign liver lesions because of the similar US appearance and vascular architecture of malignant and benign lesions, especially in a background of liver cirrhosis, and are effective in characterizing incidental focal liver lesions as benign or malignant in the normal liver only in 40-50% of the cases provided that a typical pattern is identified, as in haemangiomas appearing homogeneously hyperechoic or in liver metastases presenting a peripheral hypoechoic halo or also in FNHs presenting a spoke wheel -shaped central vascular pattern at colour Doppler US [17,18]. This is mainly due to the well known limitations of Colour Doppler US including colour signal saturation, motion and blooming artefacts, and insensitivity to the slow flow of capillary vessels due to wall filter.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furtehrmore, in a more complex clinical setting, US may identify doubtful focal liver lesions during pre-surgical tumour staging or during post-surgical follow-up, or may detect hepatocellular nodules during surveillance for liver cirrhosis. Unenhanced grey-scale US and colour Doppler US present clear limitations in differentiating malignant from benign liver lesions because of the similar US appearance and vascular architecture of malignant and benign lesions, especially in a background of liver cirrhosis, and are effective in characterizing incidental focal liver lesions as benign or malignant in the normal liver only in 40-50% of the cases provided that a typical pattern is identified, as in haemangiomas appearing homogeneously hyperechoic or in liver metastases presenting a peripheral hypoechoic halo or also in FNHs presenting a spoke wheel -shaped central vascular pattern at colour Doppler US [17,18]. This is mainly due to the well known limitations of Colour Doppler US including colour signal saturation, motion and blooming artefacts, and insensitivity to the slow flow of capillary vessels due to wall filter.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our study showed that the presence of both intra-and peritumoral arterial flow was strongly suggestive of malignancy, whereas the presence of intratumoral venous flow was remarkably suggestive of benignancy [4][5][6][7] . Intratumoral and peritumoral arterial flow signals were obtained in 92% of malignant tumors, but only in 52% of benign lesions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there is no report on the use of color Doppler sonography in the diagnosis of intestinal venous malformation. In liver hemangiomas, Tanaka et al 12 reported that color Doppler imaging revealed a characteristic spot pattern of internal vascularity in up to 50% of cases, but Nino-Murcia et al 13 and Choi et al 14 reported that color Doppler imaging showed no internal vascularity in most lesions. Cavernous venous malformations in the liver are histologically heterogeneous, and their imaging appearances vary depending on the size of vascular channels and the intervening septa of connective tissue.…”
Section: Mmentioning
confidence: 99%