“…Crosssectional imaging (e.g., computed tomography and magnetic resonance angiography) and invasive modalities such as angiogram appeared to offer little added value as the sensitivity of exercise ABPI and ultrasound Doppler became apparent. 3 In the present authors' opinion (as supported by recommendations from the INSITE group), 4 with the right technical expertise, ABPI and Doppler ultrasound are sufficient to diagnose iliac artery endofibrosis and crosssectional imaging should be reserved for instances of diagnostic uncertainty, where the extent of proximal disease cannot be visualised through ultrasound scanning, or for the planning of re-intervention.…”