1990
DOI: 10.1148/radiology.176.1.2191364
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Color Doppler signals from breast tumors. Work in progress.

Abstract: The color Doppler signals in 60 patients with breast masses were assessed subjectively, and a regional grading method was developed for quantitation of displayed blood vessel density. Among 21 patients with breast carcinoma, moderate or high flow was demonstrated in all but one, with an average of 0.5 vessels per square centimeter and color pixels occupying 12.2% of the image area. Among 33 patients with benign disorders, no flow was demonstrated in 25 and slight to moderate flow was seen in five, with an aver… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

6
81
0
14

Year Published

1995
1995
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 183 publications
(101 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
6
81
0
14
Order By: Relevance
“…Patients can be categorized into three groups based on tumor blood flow measurements: (1) a group with very little flow heterogeneity, i.e., healthy breasts (2.7% variation, n ¼ 2); (2) a group wherein the flow increased up to 230% of that of healthy tissue, i.e., malignant tumors (n ¼ 2); and (3) a group wherein a moderate flow increase up to 153% was observed, i.e., benign tumors (n ¼ 3). These results were in qualitative agreement with previous Doppler ultrasound and PET [60][61][62][63][64][65] results where ∼470 550% increases in blood flow were reported in malignant tumors with smaller contrasts in benign cases. 63 It is clearly demonstrated from the findings above that robust flow contrasts in palpable tumors can be detected by DCS.…”
supporting
confidence: 92%
“…Patients can be categorized into three groups based on tumor blood flow measurements: (1) a group with very little flow heterogeneity, i.e., healthy breasts (2.7% variation, n ¼ 2); (2) a group wherein the flow increased up to 230% of that of healthy tissue, i.e., malignant tumors (n ¼ 2); and (3) a group wherein a moderate flow increase up to 153% was observed, i.e., benign tumors (n ¼ 3). These results were in qualitative agreement with previous Doppler ultrasound and PET [60][61][62][63][64][65] results where ∼470 550% increases in blood flow were reported in malignant tumors with smaller contrasts in benign cases. 63 It is clearly demonstrated from the findings above that robust flow contrasts in palpable tumors can be detected by DCS.…”
supporting
confidence: 92%
“…In the first studies it was emphasized as signals were more numerous and stronger in breast tumors [1,2]. Now we know that this is not true in all instances [3,4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Visualization, mapping, and quantification of the blood flow within and surrounding tumors may provide a means for differentiating between benign and malignant masses Cosgrove et al 1990Cosgrove et al , 1993Delorme et al 1995;Kedar et al 1995Kedar et al , 1996Lee et al 1996;Peters-Engl et al 1998;Vaupel et al 1989). Extension into 3D may further improve the ability of discriminating between benign and malignant masses (Carson 1997).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%