Color constancy, color‐mixing ability, and color inference

Abstract

In the laboratory, the performance of color constancy has always been unstable. The variables posed by the subjects themselves tend to be neglected. In this study, a simple color-mixing test was used to sort subjects into three groups. They were also provided with hue and brightness in a fixed color order as guidance during experimental tasks in an attempt to observe any changes in cognitive skills among subjects of varying color-mixing abilities under changed illuminations. Three hypotheses were proposed: (1) Matching hypothesis: people remember and apply the spatial locations of color surrounds to the target color to achieve color constancy; (2) Comparing hypothesis: people identify the relative difference between color surrounds to achieve color constancy; and (3) Reasoning hypothesis: people compare the color surrounds and refer to color knowledge accumulated in the past to achieve color constancy through reasoning. The experimental results were as follows if the Comparing hypothesis is taken into account, (a) when hue guidance is hidden the subjects' identification rate (IR) performance supported the Reasoning hypothesis; (b) when hue guidance was shown, the IR performance of subjects in all three groups supported the Matching hypothesis. Based on these results, this study offers two recommendations: (a) color surrounds with a fixed relative location should be avoided because spatial location memory leading to people using matching skills and (b) subjects should be screened based on their color-mixing ability because significant differences in color constancy performance exist between people with varying levels of color-mixing ability.