2007
DOI: 10.1002/col.20322
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Color changes in architectural limestones from pollution and cleaning

Abstract: This article investigates the impact of sulfur dioxide attack, deposition of dark particles in urban environments and laser cleaning with Nd:YAG 1064 nm on color change in a range of ornamental limestones. We have used the CIELAB and CIELCH systems to compare the relative importance of the variation of each coordinate for the color change. Sulfur dioxide and dark particle deposition seems to increase the chroma, most particularly in the yellow component. Particle deposition also leads to an obvious darkening o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
76
0
7

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 124 publications
(87 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
3
76
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Health effects derive primarily from particle size and concentration in the air, but for the blackening of buildings the effects derive mainly from color (i.e., EC content) and cumulative flux. In particular one should note that modern deposits have taken on a slightly different color and now appear more brownish (26). These changes may arise from oxidation processes in the organic rich materials.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Health effects derive primarily from particle size and concentration in the air, but for the blackening of buildings the effects derive mainly from color (i.e., EC content) and cumulative flux. In particular one should note that modern deposits have taken on a slightly different color and now appear more brownish (26). These changes may arise from oxidation processes in the organic rich materials.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To quantify color change, ∆E [39,41] (12) was used taking into account different values are reported in the literature to indicate the threshold of perceivable differences [40,42,43]. Considering the largest threshold (∆E > 5), the measured ∆E appears as perceivable by human eye in almost all cases, ranging from 1.5 for SP (minimal color difference) to above 30.0 (perceived as two different colors).…”
Section: Energy and Architectural Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tanto la parte superior como la inferior muestran una diferencia de color (ΔE*) menor de 3, por lo que el producto consolidante no afecta significantemente a los parámetros colorimétricos de los materiales pétreos después del tratamiento. Esta diferencia es menor de 5 según Normal 20/85, 1996 [23], lo que implica que al tener una diferencia menor de 3 se encuentre por debajo del umbral de la percepción y no puede ser detectada visualmente [24], [25], [26].…”
Section: ±127unclassified