2014
DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2014.1411
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Colony size predicts division of labour in attine ants

Abstract: Division of labour is central to the ecological success of eusocial insects, yet the evolutionary factors driving increases in complexity in division of labour are little known. The size–complexity hypothesis proposes that, as larger colonies evolve, both non-reproductive and reproductive division of labour become more complex as workers and queens act to maximize inclusive fitness. Using a statistically robust phylogenetic comparative analysis of social and environmental traits of species within the ant tribe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
84
5

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(94 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
5
84
5
Order By: Relevance
“…There is good evidence for a size-complexity relationship within ant species 6 , but evidence among ant species is mixed 13,27 . We found no relationship between colony size and worker size variation among our 28 species of stingless bees (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is good evidence for a size-complexity relationship within ant species 6 , but evidence among ant species is mixed 13,27 . We found no relationship between colony size and worker size variation among our 28 species of stingless bees (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, in eusocial insects that have evolved a sterile worker caste, social complexity concerns selection pressures fundamentally different from those in vertebrates, particularly in relation to reproductive competition and the fitness of individual group members. Complexity in insect societies is associated not only with an increased group size but also with worker polymorphism, division of labor, and associated colony level processes of task performance and emergent collective behavior [Anderson and McShea, 2001; Thomas and Elgar, 2003;Holbrook et al, 2011;Ferguson-Gow et al, 2014;Feinerman and Korman, 2017]. Worker groups can be more efficient and accurate at decision-making than individuals, thus improving colony level fitness [Sasaki and Pratt, 2018], and task performance efficiency may be enhanced by behavioral specialization [Robinson, 1992].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, most species that form large societies will cross a phase in their ontogeny where they are composed of only few individuals, during which the division of labour into highly specialized modules may jeopardize the survival of the group as a whole. Hence, small or young societies are expected to rely more on generalists in their work force to absorb fluctuations in the environment, and there is indeed ample empirical evidence supporting the positive association between group size and division of labour [34][35][36]. From an evolutionary perspective, the fitness pay-offs of division of labour in small societies are of particular interest, as social life probably evolved starting with small groups rather than large, complex societies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%