2004
DOI: 10.1080/1047621042000213575
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Colonized teachers: examining the implementation of a scripted reading program

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
35
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this context, Aoki cautioned against the rigidity of a prescribed curriculum -a curriculum intended to promote consistency and sameness between and across classrooms and grades. Aoki's work highlighted a concern among curriculum theorists that prescribed curriculum places the teacher in a subservient position to the curriculum, diminishing his/her autonomy (Apple, 1983;Bushnell, 2003;MacGillivray, Ardell, Curwen & Palma, 2004;Schwab, 1983). Apple (1983) had concerns about what he termed the "tension" between a prescribed curriculum and teacher autonomy.…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In this context, Aoki cautioned against the rigidity of a prescribed curriculum -a curriculum intended to promote consistency and sameness between and across classrooms and grades. Aoki's work highlighted a concern among curriculum theorists that prescribed curriculum places the teacher in a subservient position to the curriculum, diminishing his/her autonomy (Apple, 1983;Bushnell, 2003;MacGillivray, Ardell, Curwen & Palma, 2004;Schwab, 1983). Apple (1983) had concerns about what he termed the "tension" between a prescribed curriculum and teacher autonomy.…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The notion of teacher deskilling and loss of teacher autonomy in relation to prescribed curriculum has been explored in various studies (Apple, 1995;Bushnell, 2003;Darling-Hammond, 1987;Goodman, Shannon, Freeman, & Murphy, 1988;Irvine & Larson, 2001;MacGillivray, Ardell, Curwen, & Palma, 2004;Pease-Alvarez & Samway, 2008;Pratte & Rury, 1988;Shannon, 1989Shannon, , 1990Shannon, , 2000Shelton, 2005). Although the studies differ in size and methodology, recurring themes are identifiable throughout the literatureloss of autonomy, teacher identity, power and control, emotional impact, and resistance.…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The majority of research on curriculum adaptation has taken place in math (e.g., Bergqvist & Bergqvist, 2016;Choppin, 2011;Drake & Sherin, 2006;Remillard, 2000Remillard, , 2005Simon & Tzur, 1999) and science (e.g., Davis et al, 2014;Debarger et al, 2016;Forbes, 2011;Penuel et al, 2014). With a few exceptions, existing research into literacy teachers' adaptations has focused on teachers who are resistant to a mandated curriculum (e.g., MacGillivray, Ardell, Curwen, & Palma, 2004;Maniates, 2016;Palmer & Rangel, 2011;Pease-Alvarez, Samway, & CifkaHerrera, 2010;Stillman & Anderson, 2015), teachers who are new to the field (e.g., Grossman & Thompson, 2008;Pardo, 2006;Valencia, Place, Martin, & Grossman, 2006) or both (e.g., Achinstein & Ogawa, 2006;Smagorinsky, Lakly, & Johnson, 2002). …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More specifically, these policy initiatives and their subsequent implementation shape educational practices. As a result of a new emphasis on standards and assessments, many schools across the country are experiencing the narrowing of literacy curricula, particularly in urban school systems with high concentrations of poverty (MacGillivray, Lassiter Ardell, Curwen, & Palma, 2004), such as New York City (NYC) public schools (Lapham, 2013). Because of this curricular narrowing, much attention has already been paid to examining and critiquing the Common Core State Standards (CCSS) as a significant artifact in the standards-era debate (Olivant, 2015).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%