2023
DOI: 10.1002/ecs2.4336
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Colonization of a temperate river by mobile fish following habitat reconnection

Abstract: Mobile species are particularly affected by artificial barriers requiring large investments to restore connectivity. However, few large-scale, long-term studies have investigated the ecological outcomes of restoring connectivity for these species. Our study, spanning 15-20 years, quantified response trajectories, which represent temporal trends following disturbance, of three native salmonids colonizing 20 km of protected habitat following restoration of fish passage at Landsburg Dam, Cedar River, WA, in 2003.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 105 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Those that have, primarily described changes in the river community using perhaps more basic metrics such as community composition, species richness, abundance or density (e.g., Catalano et al, 2007;Stanley et al, 2007;Maloney et al, 2008;Burroughs et al, 2010;Kornis et al, 2015;Magilligan et al, 2016;Poulos and Chernoff, 2017;Bubb et al, 2021). Furthermore, such studies often used methods that have provided information regarding only a snap-shot in time and/or space such as electrofishing, hydroacoustics, snorkeling or eDNA (e.g., Dorobek et al, 2015;Hogg et al, 2015;Duda et al, 2020;Scherelis et al, 2020;Huang et al, 2023;Jones et al, 2023;Kiffney et al, 2023;Whittum et al, 2023) and were often narrowly-scoped temporally, spatially or both (Bellmore et al, 2017;Foley et al, 2017;Whittum et al, 2023). These methods may not fully reflect fish responses, and do not reveal any direct information about fish movement and timing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Those that have, primarily described changes in the river community using perhaps more basic metrics such as community composition, species richness, abundance or density (e.g., Catalano et al, 2007;Stanley et al, 2007;Maloney et al, 2008;Burroughs et al, 2010;Kornis et al, 2015;Magilligan et al, 2016;Poulos and Chernoff, 2017;Bubb et al, 2021). Furthermore, such studies often used methods that have provided information regarding only a snap-shot in time and/or space such as electrofishing, hydroacoustics, snorkeling or eDNA (e.g., Dorobek et al, 2015;Hogg et al, 2015;Duda et al, 2020;Scherelis et al, 2020;Huang et al, 2023;Jones et al, 2023;Kiffney et al, 2023;Whittum et al, 2023) and were often narrowly-scoped temporally, spatially or both (Bellmore et al, 2017;Foley et al, 2017;Whittum et al, 2023). These methods may not fully reflect fish responses, and do not reveal any direct information about fish movement and timing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%