In this paper I explore some of the issues associated with teaching about race, culture and ethnicity in a psychology program. These curriculum initiatives are part of a broader agenda of raising awareness about racialised oppression and exclusion and contributing to the development of ways of researching and practicing psychology that are transformative and culturally sensitive. I overview the broader context and describe our subject and the guiding principles. This is followed by a description and analysis of two events in the classroom that illustrate the ways in which students differentially respond to the challenges posed by writings that challenge taken for granted understandings of race. Part of the analysis shows that students can often engage in the reproduction of oppressive practices and invest in whiteness.It is suggested that more than single semester subjects are required to promote and support the development of critical capacities for anti-racism practice. There is also a body of research and writing by ethnic minorities in different countries that is part of the broader movement of indigenous peoples advocating for the reconstruction and development of a psychology that can positively contribute to social justice for Indigenous and other minority communities in Australia and elsewhere (e.g., Bulhan, 1980Bulhan, , 1985 4 Comas-Díaz, Lykes, Alarcón, 1998;Harris, Carney, & Fine, 2002;Martin, 2003). In my view this writing is vital to informing critical pedagogy that is aimed at developing forms of psychological pedagogy and practice that is reflexive and transformative of oppressive racial power relations (see Denzin, 2003;Freire, 1972;hooks, 1990).
KeywordsIn this paper, I share some lessons about developing curriculum that is aimed at incorporating considerations of race, culture and ethnicity in psychology courses.
Whiteness studiesIn addition to this writing there is the area of critical whiteness studies that potentially complements the work in areas of decolonisation because of its focus on interrogating and transforming dominance (Fine, Powell, & Mun Wong, 1997;Frankenberg, 1997; Sue, 2004).Whiteness studies are typically concerned with antiracism and how white people's identities and positions are shaped by racialised cultures. Frankenberg (1993) wrote that whiteness can be broadly defined as "...the production and reproduction of dominance rather than subordination, normativity rather than marginality, and privilege rather than disadvantage" (p. 236). In Australia, whiteness is something that places white people in dominant positions, 6 grants white people unfair privileges, and that this dominance and privilege is not visible to white people. The meaning of whiteness is also more complex than this. Although whiteness cannot be separated from hegemony, the relations of power within whiteness are not monolithic, complete, or uniform (Frankenberg, 1997;Kincheloe & Steinberg, 1998).Whiteness is multifaceted, situationally specific, and reinscribed around the changing meanings of...