1985
DOI: 10.1016/s0195-6701(85)80129-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Colonization and infection of mothers and neonates with group B streptococci in three Italian hospitals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The only case of early‐onset disease was caused by type III, a C protein‐negative GBS strain, and occurred in a full‐term neonate born to a lightly colonized mother without risk factors. This is not unusual, since it has been reported that light colonization causes up to 50% of neonatal infections [13,26]. During the study period, the incidence of GBS sepsis was 0.4/1000 live births.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 53%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The only case of early‐onset disease was caused by type III, a C protein‐negative GBS strain, and occurred in a full‐term neonate born to a lightly colonized mother without risk factors. This is not unusual, since it has been reported that light colonization causes up to 50% of neonatal infections [13,26]. During the study period, the incidence of GBS sepsis was 0.4/1000 live births.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 53%
“…Thirty‐seven GBS strains, isolated from mothers and newborns in the last 6 months of the study, were serotyped according to standard procedures at the WHO Reference Centre for Streptococci and Streptococcal Diseases at the Laboratory of Bacteriology and Medical Mycology of the Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Rome, Italy [13]. Briefly, GBS typing of capsular polysaccharides was carried out by Ouchterlony double agar immunodiffusion.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In previous studies, GBS carriage prevalences between 1.6% and 30.4% have been described [2][3][4][5]7,8,[13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26]. The differences in these prevalences can probably be explained by the different gestational ages at culturing, differences in culture site and in the use of different culture techniques.…”
Section: Commentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The risk of neonatal colonization may be higher in women who are stable GBS carriers [33], possibly because these women tend to have a larger bacterial burden. Overall, EOGBS disease is diagnosed in up to 2% of colonized neonates [38,39], with some of the variation between studies probably being dependent on differences in techniques used to ascertain neonatal colonization. In a critical review of literature published before 1998 Benitz et al [35] found that there was a statistically significant gradient of risk with both decreasing gestational age and birth weight.…”
Section: Neonatal Colonization and Eogbs Diseasementioning
confidence: 99%