1984
DOI: 10.1016/s0016-5085(84)80164-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Colonic Azodisalicylate Metabolism Determined by In Vivo Dialysis in Healthy Volunteers and Patients With Ulcerative Colitis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
1

Year Published

1986
1986
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 132 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
17
1
Order By: Relevance
“…23 The clinical relevance of these findings is supported by the fact that the IC 50 of these actions are in the same (mm) concentration range or even one or two orders of magnitude below the free mesalazine concentrations found intraluminally and intramucosally in IBD patients receiving mesalazine maintenance treatment (7.0-14.0 mm). 24 An attractive hypothesis for the mesalazine ⁄ NSAID mode of action in this context relates not to COX inhibition itself, but rather the accumulation of arachidonic acid, which may be the decisive antiproliferative mechanism: arachidonic acid activates alkaline sphingomyelinase, which leads to increased ceramide production with activation of caspases and other apoptotic reactions. A hypothesis linking COX-dependent and COXindependent inhibitory mechanisms together is based on the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor d (PPARd) system as a common pathway for both inflammatory (COX-dependent) and non-inflammatory (COX-independent) driven carcinogenesis.…”
Section: Mechanisms Of the Anti-proliferative Action Of Mesalazine: Cmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…23 The clinical relevance of these findings is supported by the fact that the IC 50 of these actions are in the same (mm) concentration range or even one or two orders of magnitude below the free mesalazine concentrations found intraluminally and intramucosally in IBD patients receiving mesalazine maintenance treatment (7.0-14.0 mm). 24 An attractive hypothesis for the mesalazine ⁄ NSAID mode of action in this context relates not to COX inhibition itself, but rather the accumulation of arachidonic acid, which may be the decisive antiproliferative mechanism: arachidonic acid activates alkaline sphingomyelinase, which leads to increased ceramide production with activation of caspases and other apoptotic reactions. A hypothesis linking COX-dependent and COXindependent inhibitory mechanisms together is based on the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor d (PPARd) system as a common pathway for both inflammatory (COX-dependent) and non-inflammatory (COX-independent) driven carcinogenesis.…”
Section: Mechanisms Of the Anti-proliferative Action Of Mesalazine: Cmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This contrasts with drugs which are delivered to the colon for topical action, such as the various oral delayed-release formulations of 5-aminosalicylic acid, where the luminal extracellular¯uid drug concentration is derived largely from enteric delivery. 6 Rectal dialysis should also be suitable for sampling such drugs. The procedure of rectal dialysis was well tolerated by all subjects and no adverse events occurred.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…to sample the faecal water for content of electrolytes, 4 soluble mediators of in¯ammation 5 and drugs. 6 In contrast to dialysis of faeces where dialysis bags are swallowed and collected in the stool, dialysis of the rectum samples the luminal extracellular¯uid of the lower colon only, by per rectum placement of a dialysis bag into the empty rectum. This technique has been used by a number of investigators to measure rectal concentrations of endogenously occurring compounds.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the extrapolation to faecal-concentrations per gram wet weight, however, factual concentrations may be overestimated considerably in solid faeces. In studies using dialysis bags (66,68,71), the determination of faecal concentrations (per gram wet weight) as well as recovery the analytical error by applying a standard water-fraction in calculations will be proportional to the difference between the standard and the true water-phase in the individual samples.…”
Section: V2 Methods Of the Present Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%