2021
DOI: 10.1177/01417789211020249
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coloniality and Feminist Collusion: Breaking Free, Thinking Anew

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
(42 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, one can agree with other authors that decoloniality is an analytical and philosophical framework that seeks to tackle contemporary social issues by questioning and dismantling colonial power structures (Purewal and Ung Loh 2021;Zembylas 2021). It seeks to critique colonial institutional scripts and orientations that have shaped our understanding of the world by addressing the unequal relations of power between coloniser and colonised (Dastile and Ndlovu-Gatsheni 2013;Morreira et al 2020) while also developing a more nuanced appreciation of knowledge rooted in communities and marginalised forms of thought (Bekithemba and Dipane 2017).…”
Section: Presentation Of the Theory: Decolonialitymentioning
confidence: 65%
“…Therefore, one can agree with other authors that decoloniality is an analytical and philosophical framework that seeks to tackle contemporary social issues by questioning and dismantling colonial power structures (Purewal and Ung Loh 2021;Zembylas 2021). It seeks to critique colonial institutional scripts and orientations that have shaped our understanding of the world by addressing the unequal relations of power between coloniser and colonised (Dastile and Ndlovu-Gatsheni 2013;Morreira et al 2020) while also developing a more nuanced appreciation of knowledge rooted in communities and marginalised forms of thought (Bekithemba and Dipane 2017).…”
Section: Presentation Of the Theory: Decolonialitymentioning
confidence: 65%
“…The importance of our everyday thoughts and actions in challenging injustice is also echoed in Navtej K. Purewal and Jennifer Ung Loh’s (2021, p. 1) work, where they argue for the importance of recognising and naming the ways in which feminist studies—and feminist thought by extension—‘remains mired in coloniality’. They advocate for feminists to ‘acknowledge our complicity and act by “knowing-being-doing” differently, listening to the margins and making space for feminist anti-colonial thinking’ ( ibid.…”
Section: Everyday Acts Of Refusal In the Nowmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Questioning the progressive narrative that frames decolonial feminism as more productive and contemporary, Nash also addresses the perceived gap between intersectional and transnational feminisms, which she argues has been widened further due to job advertisements in women’s studies departments. 7 This reminds us of the link between feminism and coloniality emphasised by Purewal and Ung Loh (2021, p. 1): ‘Feminist studies, in its proximate positionality, like other academic fields, has been implicit and complicit with the modern episteme of coloniality’.…”
Section: Feminist Linkagesmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Western-centric and universalising ideas about feminism have been criticised for decades (hooks, 1984; Lorde, 1984; Mohanty, 1984), but they persist, along with the mainstreaming of feminism that is increasingly tied to the idea of entrepreneurial freedom in neoliberal feminism (Rottenberg, 2017; Saraswati, 2021) and the entanglement of neoliberalism and progressive social justice movements or ‘progressive neoliberalism’ (Fraser, 2017), which gained traction globally during the MeToo movement (Lukose, 2018). As Navtej K. Purewal and Jennifer Ung Loh (2021, p. 1) argue in Feminist Review ’s themed issue on Coloniality, ‘feminist tools developed within the coloniality of power will never be able to bring about epistemic change’. We must acknowledge how feminism has been entrenched in coloniality.…”
Section: The Trouble With Decolonising Feminismmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation