2016
DOI: 10.30578/nomadas.n45a2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Colonialidad de la naturaleza: ¿imposición tecnológica y usurpación epistémica? Interculturalidad, desarrollo y re-existencia

Abstract: El artículo cuestiona las concepciones eurocéntricas de naturaleza que el proyecto moderno/colonial instauró como racionalidad económica. Igualmente indaga sobre las formas de relacionamiento entre las sociedades culturalmente diferenciadas y la naturaleza biológicamente diversa. En consecuencia, plantea la necesidad de no naturalizar el relacionamiento cultural, sino entender la interculturalidad como un proyecto político, ético y epistémico, donde la educación juega un papel fundamental para la transformació… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0
3

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
1
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…That is why it does not refer only to racial classification, but to a broader phenomenon that permeates sexual access, collective authority, work, subjectivity/intersubjectivity, and the production of knowledge from within intersubjective relationships (Lugones 2008, 20). The coloniality of knowledge , as Edgardo Lander states, is another face of coloniality , key to the imposition of colonial/modern/capitalist/racist reason (Lander 2011), as well as the coloniality of gender (Lugones 2008), the coloniality of being (Maldonado 2008), and the coloniality of nature (Albán and Rosero 2016).…”
Section: Coloniality Of Power and Racialization Of The Worldmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…That is why it does not refer only to racial classification, but to a broader phenomenon that permeates sexual access, collective authority, work, subjectivity/intersubjectivity, and the production of knowledge from within intersubjective relationships (Lugones 2008, 20). The coloniality of knowledge , as Edgardo Lander states, is another face of coloniality , key to the imposition of colonial/modern/capitalist/racist reason (Lander 2011), as well as the coloniality of gender (Lugones 2008), the coloniality of being (Maldonado 2008), and the coloniality of nature (Albán and Rosero 2016).…”
Section: Coloniality Of Power and Racialization Of The Worldmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Adolfo Albán A. y José R. Rosero [2016] sostienen: "La colonialidad de la naturaleza, tal vez va más allá de la colonización de esta, deberá entenderse como la manera en que se construyen discursos hegemonizantes y excluyentes con respecto a quienes tienen el derecho de conocerla y explotarla, de protegerla y resguardarla" [30].…”
Section: Colonialidad De La Naturaleza Y Defensa De La Vida-tierraunclassified
“…Albán, Adolfo y Rosero, José [2016], "Colonialidad de la naturaleza: ¿imposición tecnológica y usurpación epistémica? Interculturalidad, desarrollo y re-existencia", Nómadas, 27-41.…”
unclassified
“…Articuladamente, a colonialidade tornou concreta a universalização de uma narrativa excludente calcada pela exploração de populações negras e indígenas, enquanto incorporou seus elementosmateriais e simbólicosnas transações do mercado mundial. Entre esses elementos, caracteriza-se a natureza latino-americana, revelando que o intenso extrativismo da biodiversidade e a externalização da natureza se coadunam com a expropriação epistemológica, política e ontológica dos povos que carregam outras relações entre a cultura e a natureza (ALBÁN; ROSERO, 2016). Logo, se deflagra o processo de colonialidade da natureza como um padrão de extermínio cosmogônico:…”
Section: Introductionunclassified