2003
DOI: 10.1177/0090591702251011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Colonial Violence And The Rhetoric Of Evasion

Abstract: Tocqueville's contradictory writings on imperialism have produced interpretations that range from unrepentant realism to lapsed universalism. This essay considers the moral psychology that underlies his position. It argues that Tocqueville's writings on colonialism exemplify his resort to apologia when his deepest apprehensions are aroused and offers a typology of Tocquevillean rhetorical evasions: the mechanisms by which he attempts to quell perceptions of moral dissonance. It also argues that Tocqueville's e… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The net effect is that "blame" is localized. In this way, the analogies contribute to what has been called "a rhetoric of evasion" (Welch 2003).…”
Section: T H E Geographical Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The net effect is that "blame" is localized. In this way, the analogies contribute to what has been called "a rhetoric of evasion" (Welch 2003).…”
Section: T H E Geographical Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 48 Wolin 2003, 268; see also 230. Cheryl Welch identifies a related, but somewhat different, strategy of containment in Tocqueville’s writings on Algeria, in which he “attempts to quarantine and thus seal off the moral evils necessary to conquer North Africa” and to crowd out ethical concerns by focusing “on the techniques of warfare and the administrative details of policy making”; see Welch 2003, 252. …”
Section: Notesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is political theorists interested in leading French liberal thinkers, especially Alexis de Tocqueville, who have begun to break this exclusive focus on republican imperialism. 10 Important as their work is, however, it risks reproducing the focus on imperial "tensions" and "contradictions" within otherwise admirable ideologies, simply substituting nineteenth-century liberalism for eighteenth-or twentieth-century republicanism. The contributions to this special issue represent a new wave of scholarship that brings the insights of recent post-Revolutionary historiography to the process of colonial transition, when people across the empire saw in the uncertainties of the period opportunities and obligations to restructure colonial states, economies, and societies and to reimagine the relationship between France and its colonies.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%