Colonial Army Recruitment Patterns and Post-Colonial Military Coups D’état in Africa: The Case of Nigeria, 1966-1993

Abstract

Since time immemorial, societies, states and state builders have been challenged and transformed by the need and quest for military manpower.1 European states relied on conscript armies to ‘pacify’ and retain colonies in parts of the non-European world. These facts underscore the meticulous attention paid by the British to the recruitment of their colonial forces in Africa. In the Niger basin for one, conscious efforts were made by individual agents of the British Crown and at official level to ensure that only members of designated groups were recruited into those colonial forces that facilitated the establishment of the Nigerian supra-national state. The end of colonial rule and shifts in military recruitment policies hardly erased the vestiges of colonial recruitment from the Nigerian military. The study on which this article is based and which examines Britain’s policies on military human resource recruitment as state-building initiatives, argued that military coups d’état in Nigeria can be traced back to colonial and post-colonial recruitment patterns for military human resources

Anchored in History: Understanding the Persistence of Eco-Violence in Nigeria’s Middle Belt through Collective Memory

“…In sum, the Middle Belt can be said to be a region bedevilled by several conflicts for over a century, fighting among its people and against outsiders. The current carnage in the Middle Belt which is characterised by the mass murder of people and destruction in communities is not different from past events in the region, as espoused by narratives from several scholars (Isichei 1982, p. 210;Ojie 2006;Ellis 2016, p. 81;Ejiogu 2007;Ojo 2020;Olumba 2022b). Thus, the past is represented in the present carnage in the Middle Belt.…”

The Security-Force Ethnicity (SFE) Project: Introducing a new dataset

“…Ethnically skewed militaries have often resorted to force to overturn the state’s political leadership in coups d’état. Motives for doing so include protecting their institutional privileges within the military, preventing political turnover that would result in loss of power for their ethnic group, capturing the state to advance their group’s political position, or even, following ethnic security dilemma logic (Posen, 1993), pre-empting another group’s capture of the state (Ejiogu, 2007; Enloe, 1980a; Harkness, 2016; Horowitz, 1985: ch. 12; Jenkins and Kposowa, 1992; Roessler, 2011).…”