2002
DOI: 10.2307/1468300
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Colonial Aggregates: Effects of Spatial Position on Zebra Mussel Responses to Vertical Gradients in Interstitial Water Quality

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
52
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
52
0
Order By: Relevance
“…see Thayer, 1975) where they have adopted an infaunal lifestyle (Dermott and Munawar, 1993). Zebra mussels are known to move in response to environmental conditions (Kobak, 2001;Toomey et al, 2002;Burks et al, 2002). Shell S. M. Peyer, J. C. Hermanson and C. E. Lee morphology might affect such movement and have important consequences for habitat selection and survival of both zebra and quagga mussels.…”
Section: Functional Consequences Of Shell Morphologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…see Thayer, 1975) where they have adopted an infaunal lifestyle (Dermott and Munawar, 1993). Zebra mussels are known to move in response to environmental conditions (Kobak, 2001;Toomey et al, 2002;Burks et al, 2002). Shell S. M. Peyer, J. C. Hermanson and C. E. Lee morphology might affect such movement and have important consequences for habitat selection and survival of both zebra and quagga mussels.…”
Section: Functional Consequences Of Shell Morphologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Directed movement is likely to be a fitness-related trait that affects fitness and survival. As mentioned previously (see Introduction), zebra mussels have been found to move in response to environmental factors, including light, nitrogenous waste, oxygen and substrate type (see Burks et al, 2002;Kilgour and Mackie, 1993;Kobak, 2001;Kobak and Nowacki, 2007;Marsden and Lansky, 2000;Toomey et al, 2002). A previous study found that zebra mussels moved 22cm within a 2h period (Toomey et al, 2002).…”
Section: Functional Consequences Of Shell Morphology For Locomotion Amentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Zebra mussels are known to move in response to various environmental factors (e.g. light, nitrogenous waste, oxygen and substrate type) that influence habitat selection and survival (see Burks et al, 2002;Kilgour and Mackie, 1993;Kobak, 2001;Kobak and Nowacki, 2007;Marsden and Lansky, 2000;Toomey et al, 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides, in some bivalves, including zebra mussels, adult individuals enhance juvenile attachment (URYU et al 1996, KOBAK 2001. On the other hand, new settlers may avoid adult aggregations, escaping from unfavourable effects of life in high density: intraspecific competition, accumulation of faeces and oxygen depletion (BURKS et al 2002). For instance, STAÑCZYKOWSKA (1964) observed deteriorating physical condition of mussels living in dense assemblages.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, hard surfaces are preferred to soft sediments (LEWANDOWSKI 1982, KARATAYEV 1995, and biofilm-covered sites to clean ones (WAINMAN et al 1996, GU et al 1997. Besides, mussel locomotion is influenced by gravity (KOBAK 2001(KOBAK , 2002 and a position within a colony (BURKS et al 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%