1971
DOI: 10.1002/1097-0142(197107)28:1<60::aid-cncr2820280113>3.0.co;2-u
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Colon carcinogens: Their metabolism and mode of action

Abstract: Colon cancer in man almost certainly is induced by environmental factors, probably consumed with food. Except for one breed of hamsters, colon cancer is infrequent in laboratory or domestic animals. Reliable induction of colon cancer can be achieved with 2 broad classes of chemicals: 1. derivatives of 3‐methyl‐4‐aminobiphenyl, and 2. derivatives of 1, 2‐dimethylhydrazine, including the plant product cycasin. Sometimes an unknown ingredient of bracken fern causes cecal or colonic cancers. The metabolism of 4‐am… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
46
0
2

Year Published

1974
1974
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 209 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
2
46
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…DMH is classified as a pro-carcinogen agent, that is, it requires metabolic activation to become an active carcinogen (LaMont and O'Gorman, 1978), and the activation mainly occurs in the liver, with oxidation of DMH in azomethane and, subsequently, in azoxymethane, which, in turn, is converted into methyl-azoxymethane (Weisburger, 1971;LaMont and O'Gorman, 1978). At body temperature, methyl-azoxymethane is an unstable compound that undergoes decomposition spontaneously, giving rise to formaldehyde, water, nitrogen, and methyl diazonium, an alkylating agent that introduces a reactive carbonic ion capable of reacting with DNA, RNA, and proteins (Weisburger, 1971).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DMH is classified as a pro-carcinogen agent, that is, it requires metabolic activation to become an active carcinogen (LaMont and O'Gorman, 1978), and the activation mainly occurs in the liver, with oxidation of DMH in azomethane and, subsequently, in azoxymethane, which, in turn, is converted into methyl-azoxymethane (Weisburger, 1971;LaMont and O'Gorman, 1978). At body temperature, methyl-azoxymethane is an unstable compound that undergoes decomposition spontaneously, giving rise to formaldehyde, water, nitrogen, and methyl diazonium, an alkylating agent that introduces a reactive carbonic ion capable of reacting with DNA, RNA, and proteins (Weisburger, 1971).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The model of induction using subcutaneous DMH is a very well known and experimented model (19,20) used to obtain tumors resembling human colorectal cancer, both microscopically and in clinical behavior (18). Most authors consider that only one dose of 20 mg per kilogram of weight, injected weekly for 26 weeks, may induce a very high incidence of colorectal adenocarcinomas (18,19,(21)(22)(23)(24).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The formald.ehyde was assayed by the method of MacFadyen (1945). Included in this measurement would be the formaldehyde produced from any /8-glucuronide of methylazoxymethanol present as postulated by Weisburger (1971 WAeisburger's hypothesis. This finding for 1,2-dimethylhydrazine is in contrast to that with another colon carcinogen 3-2'-dimethyl-4-aminobiphenyl (Spjut and Noall, 1970).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The similarities in the metabolism of 1,2-dimethylhydrazine and other carcinogens such as cycasin and dimethylnitrosamine, for which the same ultimate carcinogenic metabolite has been postulated, have been discussed previously (Preussmann et al, 1969;. Weisburger (1971) has proposed that 1,2-dimethylhydrazine induces colon tumours because it is metabolized in the liver to methylazoxymethanol (the proximate carcinogen of cycasin) and excreted as the glucuronide in the bile; the conjugate is postulated to be hydrolysed by enzymes of the gut flora, releasing methylazoxymethanol at the site of tumour productioin. 1,2-Dimethylhydrazine has previously been shown to methylate mouse liver and colon nucleic acids in vivo whilst Kruger, Wiessler and Rucker (1970) (Hawks et at., 1971).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%