2001
DOI: 10.1007/bf02339582
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Collusive outcomes in price competition

Abstract: price competition, collusion, convex cost, L13,

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
24
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
(7 reference statements)
2
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This result is also in line with Dastidar (2001) showing that if the second derivative of the cost function is non-increasing in output, it is easier to sustain collusion when the number of firms increases. Indeed, our cost function meets such condition.…”
Section: Price Competition and Convex Costssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…This result is also in line with Dastidar (2001) showing that if the second derivative of the cost function is non-increasing in output, it is easier to sustain collusion when the number of firms increases. Indeed, our cost function meets such condition.…”
Section: Price Competition and Convex Costssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Moreover, some studies focus on a collusive price to narrow the set of Nash equilibria (e.g. Dastidar, 2001;Gori et al, 2014). This criterion is also similar to that in our approach.…”
Section: Modelmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…It is notable that the critical value of the relative slope of the marginal cost curve required for this result, * ¼ 0.226, seems quite low. The difference between the Bertrand and the Cournot critical discount factors as a function of the degree of product substitutability and the relative slope of the marginal cost curve is shown in Figure 2 3 In contrast to Proposition 1, Dastidar (2001) shows that collusion can be sustained in single-shot Bertrand oligopoly with homogeneous products when the cost function is convex, whereas it cannot be sustained in a single-shot Cournot oligopoly.…”
Section: Bulletin Of Economic Researchmentioning
confidence: 89%