2019
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.8b12251
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Colloidal Rare Earth Vanadate Single Crystalline Particles as Ratiometric Luminescent Thermometers

Abstract: Thulium/ytterbium-doped yttrium vanadate particles provide a ratiometric thermal response as both colloids and powders via downshift or upconversion emissions. Here, we synthesized yttrium vanadates by controlled colloidal conversion of hydroxycarbonate precursors. A protected annealing process yielded single crystalline and readily dispersible particles that were manipulated individually by optical tweezers in water. Because individual particles displayed detectable emissions, this system has potential applic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0
5

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
(167 reference statements)
0
19
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…The relative thermal sensitivity is defined as [1] stated in Equation 3: Figure 3c shows S rel calculated for our particles, with a value of 3.3% K −1 at 298 K. Since it depends on the ∆E value, that does not change substantially when changing the doping concentration, only a single value can be given for all the nanoparticles analyzed. The S rel values reported in the literature are between 1.0 and 28% K −1 , with most of the values being in the range 2.0-3.3% K −1 [34][35][36][37][38][39][40]. The value we report here for Tm,Yb:GdVO 4 @SiO 2 nanoparticles is the highest reported up to now in the literature for Tm 3+ -doped systems, only surpassed by that of Tm:NaYbF 4 @SiO 2 nanoparticles, although in that case, the maximum thermal relative sensitivity has been found at 100 K, far away from the biological range of temperatures.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The relative thermal sensitivity is defined as [1] stated in Equation 3: Figure 3c shows S rel calculated for our particles, with a value of 3.3% K −1 at 298 K. Since it depends on the ∆E value, that does not change substantially when changing the doping concentration, only a single value can be given for all the nanoparticles analyzed. The S rel values reported in the literature are between 1.0 and 28% K −1 , with most of the values being in the range 2.0-3.3% K −1 [34][35][36][37][38][39][40]. The value we report here for Tm,Yb:GdVO 4 @SiO 2 nanoparticles is the highest reported up to now in the literature for Tm 3+ -doped systems, only surpassed by that of Tm:NaYbF 4 @SiO 2 nanoparticles, although in that case, the maximum thermal relative sensitivity has been found at 100 K, far away from the biological range of temperatures.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Nesse sentido, o campo da nanotermometria óptica utilizando a luminescência de íons lantanídeos é um campo em crescente ascensão, não apenas com a utilização de LOFs, mas também de nanopartículas sólidas e coloidais, com uma imensa gama de aplicações para o sensoriamento térmico em nanoescala. [154][155][156][157][158] Além das aplicações como materiais luminescentes, as TR são fundamentais no campo dos materiais magnéticos. Atualmente, os magnetos de Nd 2 Fe 14 B oferecem uma melhor relação potência-peso na indústria de ímãs e ainda mais alta eficiência na conversão de energia elétrica em energia mecânica em motores, ou vice-versa em geradores.…”
Section: Aplicaçõesunclassified
“…In addition to ensemble measurements, assessing the nonlinear optical response at the singleparticle level enables further studies relating structure to property, since UCNP nanoparticle composition and morphology influence upconversion emission intensities. Recently, single UCNP power dependence studies performed by optical trapping measurements have been reported [16], which enabled characterization of the nonlinear optical properties of individual nanoparticles and comparison with ensemble measurements. In the work described in reference [16], the authors varied the intensity of the trapping laser beam while monitoring UCNP emission to record their power dependence.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, single UCNP power dependence studies performed by optical trapping measurements have been reported [16], which enabled characterization of the nonlinear optical properties of individual nanoparticles and comparison with ensemble measurements. In the work described in reference [16], the authors varied the intensity of the trapping laser beam while monitoring UCNP emission to record their power dependence.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%