2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.08.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Colloid transport and remobilization in porous media during infiltration and drainage

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
35
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
2
35
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The saturated hydraulic conductivity, measured prior to exsolution, was 28.3 ± 4.2, 73.8 ± 4.6, and 20.0 ± 1.8 cm/min for the 20/30, 12/20, and mixed sands, respectively, showing reasonable repeatability between packings of the same sand (Table 2). These values are higher than those reported elsewhere (Schroth et al, 1996; Zhuang et al, 2009), also due to the looser packing. The saturated hydraulic conductivity of the mixed sand was lower than that of the 20/30 and 12/20 sands, which was expected given its poorly sorted nature.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The saturated hydraulic conductivity, measured prior to exsolution, was 28.3 ± 4.2, 73.8 ± 4.6, and 20.0 ± 1.8 cm/min for the 20/30, 12/20, and mixed sands, respectively, showing reasonable repeatability between packings of the same sand (Table 2). These values are higher than those reported elsewhere (Schroth et al, 1996; Zhuang et al, 2009), also due to the looser packing. The saturated hydraulic conductivity of the mixed sand was lower than that of the 20/30 and 12/20 sands, which was expected given its poorly sorted nature.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 80%
“…The porosity of each sand pack was calculated based on a measured bulk density. The average porosity of each of the 20/30 and 12/20 sands was 0.38 (Table 1), which is at the upper end of other reported values (Hegele and Mumford, 2014;Niemet and Selker, 2001;Schroth et al, 1996;Smits et al, 2010;Zhuang et al, 2009), and the average porosity of the mixed sand was 0.36. Residual water saturations were measured in a separate set of nine experiments conducted in the same flow cell (three per sand type) following the procedure described below but starting with a watersaturated sand pack rather than a sand pack after exsolution and dissolution.…”
Section: Sand Pack Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…Several drainage and imbibition column experiments have been performed to study the remobilization of colloids and viruses as a result of transient, unsaturated flow. Results showed that the concentration of viruses at the outlet increased when a wetting front arrived (Ryan et al, 1998; Powelson and Mills, 2001; Saiers and Lenhart, 2003; Torkzaban et al, 2006a, 2006b; Shang et al, 2008; Zhuang et al, 2009; Cheng and Saiers, 2009). These studies suggest that temporal changes in saturation, whether drainage or imbibition, promote the remobilization of attached viruses and colloids.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5a) were contrary to the expectation that greater mobilization would occur at greater FR due to greater hydraulic stress on the particles (Du et al 2013;Sasidharan et al 2014;Yu et al 2013;Zhuang et al 2009). In our experiments, FR increase slightly restrained mobilization and transport of the tailing particles.…”
Section: Effect Of Flow Rate Perturbations On Tailing Particle Releasementioning
confidence: 73%